Ad is loading...
CZA vs IWR
CZA vs IWR Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs IWR
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$105.78
Change-$1.17 (-1.09%)
Volume$2.2K
Net Assets192.51M
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
Price$89.88
Change-$2.01 (-2.19%)
Volume$929.74K
Net Assets39.16B
CZA vs IWR Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. IWR commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Hold and IWR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWR has more net assets: 39.2B vs. CZA (193M). CZA has a higher annual dividend yield than IWR: CZA (1.818) vs IWR (1.674). CZA was incepted earlier than IWR: CZA (18 years) vs IWR (24 years). CZA has a higher turnover IWR (12.00) vs IWR (12.00).
| CZA | IWR | CZA / IWR | |
| Gain YTD | 1.818 | 1.674 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 193M | 39.2B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 122.00 | 12.00 | 1,017% |
| Yield | 1.26 | 1.27 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWR | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IBTJ | 21.48 | 0.07 | +0.33% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Tr ETF | |||
| PYLD | 26.28 | 0.05 | +0.19% |
| PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF | |||
| FPFD | 21.72 | 0.03 | +0.14% |
| Fidelity Preferred Securities & Inc ETF | |||
| BSMT | 23.07 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2029 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| JHID | 29.80 | -0.24 | -0.79% |
| JHancock International High Dividend ETF | |||
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZA has been closely correlated with ACT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZA jumps, then ACT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZA | 100% | -1.10% | ||
| ACT - CZA | 68% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| JHG - CZA | 67% Closely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| ESNT - CZA | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| ESAB - CZA | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| J - CZA | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
More | ||||