Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZA vs IWR
CZA vs IWR Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs IWR
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$108.14
Change-$0.66 (-0.61%)
Volume$3.34K
Net Assets186.07M
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
Price$93.16
Change-$0.84 (-0.89%)
Volume$1.33M
Net Assets43.08B
CZA vs IWR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. IWR commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Buy and IWR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWR has more net assets: 43.1B vs. CZA (186M). IWR has a higher annual dividend yield than CZA: IWR (6.018) vs CZA (4.086). CZA was incepted earlier than IWR: CZA (18 years) vs IWR (24 years). IWR (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than CZA (0.69). CZA has a higher turnover IWR (9.00) vs IWR (9.00).
| CZA | IWR | CZA / IWR | |
| Gain YTD | 4.086 | 6.018 | 68% |
| Net Assets | 186M | 43.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.19 | 363% |
| Turnover | 118.00 | 9.00 | 1,311% |
| Yield | 1.24 | 1.33 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZA has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZA jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZA | 100% | -0.61% | ||
| JHG - CZA | 80% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| DD - CZA | 80% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| FTV - CZA | 79% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| CRBG - CZA | 76% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| CBSH - CZA | 76% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
More | ||||