54 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
CZA vs J
CZA vs J Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs J
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$105.04
Change-$3.10 (-2.87%)
Volume$3.79K
CapitalizationN/A
Jacobs Solutions
Price$132.62
Change-$2.04 (-1.51%)
Volume$6.18K
CapitalizationN/A
CZA vs J Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. J commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Hold and J is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
J: Fundamental Ratings
J | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 42 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | J | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 8 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZA has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZA jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZA | 100% | -1.09% | ||
| JHG - CZA | 72% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| ESNT - CZA | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| J - CZA | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| ACT - CZA | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| ESAB - CZA | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||
J and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, J has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if J jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y