J | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 11 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CZA | J | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 24 days ago88% | 3 days ago55% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 24 days ago81% | 3 days ago52% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 24 days ago83% | 3 days ago65% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 24 days ago76% | 3 days ago51% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 24 days ago75% | 3 days ago66% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago75% | 3 days ago47% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago45% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 24 days ago79% | 3 days ago39% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZA has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZA jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CZA | 100% | +1.23% | ||
JHG - CZA | 71% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
ESNT - CZA | 67% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
ACT - CZA | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
ESAB - CZA | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.33% | ||
J - CZA | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
More |