Advertisement
J vs KBR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J) vs. KBR, Inc. (KBR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J) boasts a larger market capitalization of approximately $15.1 billion and trailing twelve-month (TTM) revenue of $12.4 billion, dwarfing KBR, Inc.'s (KBR) $4.7 billion market cap and $7.8 billion revenue.
- KBR trades at a more attractive price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 10.7 compared to J's elevated 34.0, suggesting better relative value amid recent contract wins.
- Year-to-date (YTD), KBR has outperformed with a 6.4% gain versus J's 2.4%, though both face sector headwinds in recent market activity.
- Recent developments highlight J's AI data center contracts boosting long-term growth potential, while KBR secures defense and technology deals enhancing stability.
- KBR demonstrates superior return on equity (ROE) at 30.8% TTM versus J's 9.7%, indicating efficient capital use.
Introduction
Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J) and KBR, Inc. (KBR) operate in the competitive engineering and professional services sector, delivering critical infrastructure, technology, and government solutions. This comparison is relevant for investors eyeing industrials exposure amid evolving demands in AI infrastructure, defense, and sustainable technologies. Traders may find value in assessing their relative performance, valuation metrics, and recent catalysts, as both stocks navigate market volatility and sector-specific growth drivers in the current environment.
J Overview and Recent Performance
Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J) is a global leader in technical professional services, spanning critical mission solutions, data-driven infrastructure, and water management. With TTM revenue of $12.4 billion and a market cap near $15.1 billion, the company has positioned itself in high-growth areas like AI data centers, including a major $7 billion contract with Hut 8. In recent weeks, shares have shown mixed behavior, with a roughly 4% decline over the past three months offset by modest gains amid anticipation for Q2 earnings expected on May 5. Sentiment reflects caution due to elevated P/E ratios around 34, though analyst targets average $156, signaling potential upside from infrastructure catalysts and project backlogs.
KBR Overview and Recent Performance
KBR, Inc. (KBR) specializes in science, technology, and engineering solutions, with strong emphasis on government services, defense, and sustainable technologies. Reporting TTM revenue of $7.8 billion and a $4.7 billion market cap, the firm has secured key wins like a $510 million Department of War contract and a $200 million transportation systems award, alongside AI alliances with Tagup and investments in direct lithium extraction. Recent market activity has pressured shares, with weaker performance over recent months despite YTD gains of 6.4%; the lower P/E of 10.7 and high ROE of 30.8% underpin value appeal amid ongoing contract momentum.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available models that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—from swing trading semiconductors and AI infrastructure plays to volatility-focused industrials and defense-related assets—with impressive stats like annualized returns ranging from +23.53% to +163.10% and win rates of 51.30% to 88.33%. Highlighted performers include those targeting data centers (up to +86.50% return) and industrials boom tickers (up to +95.34%). Traders can explore these by performance, timeframe, and risk to align with current market conditions, offering automated insights for enhanced decision-making.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both firms share engineering roots but diverge in focus: J emphasizes broader infrastructure and AI-driven projects, while KBR leans toward government and defense contracts. Growth drivers contrast with J's mega AI data center deals versus KBR's steady backlog in mission-critical tech. Recent momentum favors KBR's YTD edge, though J shows greater scale. Risk profiles highlight KBR's higher debt-to-equity (192%) but lower beta (0.50 vs. 0.71), indicating relative stability. Sector exposure aligns in industrials, yet market sentiment tilts toward KBR's undervaluation amid contract visibility.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward KBR based on superior relative valuation, higher ROE, recent contract catalysts in defense and AI tech, and stronger YTD momentum. While J offers scale and infrastructure upside, KBR's lower P/E and analyst upside potential position it favorably in the near term, subject to earnings outcomes and market trends.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is J is a StrongBuy and KBR is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
J’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKBR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- J’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- KBR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
J’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KBR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- J’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KBR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
J (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -4.71% price change this week, while KBR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -7.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
J is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
KBR is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-0.46% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| J | KBR | J / KBR | |
| Capitalization | 14B | 4.07B | 344% |
| EBITDA | 894M | 916M | 98% |
| Gain YTD | -9.871 | -19.393 | 51% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.01 | 9.47 | 370% |
| Revenue | 13.2B | 7.69B | 172% |
| Total Cash | 1.37B | 305M | 450% |
| Total Debt | 4.56B | 2.81B | 162% |
J | KBR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KBR's Valuation (26) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as J (36) in the null industry. This means that KBR’s stock grew similarly to J’s over the last 12 months.
J's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as KBR (100) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that J’s stock grew similarly to KBR’s over the last 12 months.
KBR's SMR Rating (35) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for J (69) in the null industry. This means that KBR’s stock grew somewhat faster than J’s over the last 12 months.
J's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as KBR (62) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that J’s stock grew similarly to KBR’s over the last 12 months.
J's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as KBR (88) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that J’s stock grew similarly to KBR’s over the last 12 months.
| J | KBR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 52% | 12 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | N/A |
Advertisement
J and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, J has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if J jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.
KBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KBR has been loosely correlated with J. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KBR jumps, then J could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KBR | 100% | -2.16% | ||
| J - KBR | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| EXPO - KBR | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| TTEK - KBR | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| ACM - KBR | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| STN - KBR | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.20% | ||
More | ||||