Ad is loading...
CZA vs MDY
CZA vs MDY Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs MDY
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$106.85
Change+$0.18 (+0.17%)
Volume$2.2K
Net Assets198.45M
SPDR® S&P MIDCAP 400 ETF Trust
Price$591.11
Change+$2.51 (+0.43%)
Volume$543.96K
Net Assets24.52B
CZA vs MDY Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. MDY commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Hold and MDY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDY has more net assets: 24.5B vs. CZA (198M). MDY has a higher annual dividend yield than CZA: MDY (3.780) vs CZA (2.849). CZA was incepted earlier than MDY: CZA (18 years) vs MDY (30 years). CZA has a higher turnover MDY (20.07) vs MDY (20.07).
| CZA | MDY | CZA / MDY | |
| Gain YTD | 2.849 | 3.780 | 75% |
| Net Assets | 198M | 24.5B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 122.00 | 20.07 | 608% |
| Yield | 1.26 | 1.07 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 30 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | MDY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 88% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 81% | 11 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 76% | 11 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 75% | 11 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 83% | 13 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 75% | 20 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 79% | 11 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZA has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZA jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZA | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| JHG - CZA | 73% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
| ESNT - CZA | 66% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| ACT - CZA | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| J - CZA | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| ESAB - CZA | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
More | ||||
MDY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDY has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDY jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDY | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| UFPI - MDY | 81% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| KMT - MDY | 79% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| ITT - MDY | 79% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| FBIN - MDY | 79% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| KBH - MDY | 79% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||