Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
CZA vs MDY
CZA vs MDY Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs MDY
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$109.48
Change-$0.46 (-0.42%)
Volume$6.06K
CapitalizationN/A
SPDR® S&P MIDCAP 400 ETF Trust
Price$586.13
Change-$6.53 (-1.10%)
Volume$843.36K
CapitalizationN/A
CZA vs MDY Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. MDY commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a StrongSell and MDY is a StrongSell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDY has more net assets: 24.2B vs. CZA (206M). CZA (16.702) and MDY (16.509) have matching annual dividend yield . CZA was incepted earlier than MDY: CZA (18 years) vs MDY (30 years). CZA has a higher turnover MDY (20.07) vs MDY (20.07).
| CZA | MDY | CZA / MDY | |
| Gain YTD | 16.702 | 16.509 | 101% |
| Net Assets | 206M | 24.2B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 122.00 | 20.07 | 608% |
| Yield | 1.26 | 1.07 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 30 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | MDY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZA has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZA jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZA | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| JHG - CZA | 74% Closely correlated | -2.54% | ||
| ESNT - CZA | 67% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| RHP - CZA | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| ACT - CZA | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| ESAB - CZA | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
More | ||||
MDY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDY has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDY jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDY | 100% | -1.10% | ||
| UFPI - MDY | 81% Closely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| AVNT - MDY | 80% Closely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| KMT - MDY | 79% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| FBIN - MDY | 79% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| KBH - MDY | 79% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||