Ad is loading...
CZA vs MDY
CZA vs MDY Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs MDY
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$105.68
Change-$2.46 (-2.27%)
Volume$467
CapitalizationN/A
SPDR® S&P MIDCAP 400 ETF Trust
Price$569.31
Change-$22.93 (-3.87%)
Volume$20.87K
CapitalizationN/A
CZA vs MDY Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. MDY commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Hold and MDY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDY has more net assets: 25.3B vs. CZA (201M). MDY has a higher annual dividend yield than CZA: MDY (17.724) vs CZA (15.275). CZA was incepted earlier than MDY: CZA (18 years) vs MDY (30 years). CZA has a higher turnover MDY (20.07) vs MDY (20.07).
| CZA | MDY | CZA / MDY | |
| Gain YTD | 15.275 | 17.724 | 86% |
| Net Assets | 201M | 25.3B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 122.00 | 20.07 | 608% |
| Yield | 1.26 | 1.07 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 30 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | MDY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 83% | 24 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZA has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZA jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZA | 100% | -1.09% | ||
| JHG - CZA | 72% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| ESNT - CZA | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| J - CZA | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| ACT - CZA | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| ESAB - CZA | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||
MDY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDY has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDY jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDY | 100% | -1.17% | ||
| UFPI - MDY | 81% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| KMT - MDY | 79% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| AVNT - MDY | 79% Closely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| FBIN - MDY | 79% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| KBH - MDY | 79% Closely correlated | -1.18% | ||
More | ||||