Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZA vs MDY
CZA vs MDY Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs MDY
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$108.42
Change+$0.96 (+0.89%)
Volume$150
Net Assets177.2M
SPDR® S&P MIDCAP 400 ETF Trust
Price$568.85
Change-$9.04 (-1.56%)
Volume$26.54K
Net Assets22.52B
CZA vs MDY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. MDY commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Hold and MDY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDY has more net assets: 22.5B vs. CZA (177M). CZA has a higher annual dividend yield than MDY: CZA (2.868) vs MDY (0.670). CZA was incepted earlier than MDY: CZA (19 years) vs MDY (31 years). MDY (0.24) has a lower expense ratio than CZA (0.69). CZA has a higher turnover MDY (20.43) vs MDY (20.43).
| CZA | MDY | CZA / MDY | |
| Gain YTD | 2.868 | 0.670 | 428% |
| Net Assets | 177M | 22.5B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.24 | 288% |
| Turnover | 112.00 | 20.43 | 548% |
| Yield | 1.21 | 1.15 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 31 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | MDY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CZA and FMC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZA and FMC's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y