| CZA | VO | CZA / VO | |
| Gain YTD | 2.868 | 5.364 | 53% |
| Net Assets | 177M | 199B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.04 | 1,725% |
| Turnover | 112.00 | 16.00 | 700% |
| Yield | 1.21 | 1.50 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 22 years | - |
| CZA | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 80% | 9 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CZA and FMC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZA and FMC's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VO has been closely correlated with TRMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VO jumps, then TRMB could also see price increases.