Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZAR vs GLOV
CZAR vs GLOV Comparison
Open Charts CZAR vs GLOV
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
Price$31.36
Change-$0.89 (-2.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57M
Goldman Sachs ActBt Wld Lw Vl Ps Eq ETF
Price$56.16
Change-$0.20 (-0.35%)
Volume$43.53K
Net Assets1.48B
CZAR vs GLOV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZAR vs. GLOV commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZAR is a Hold and GLOV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLOV has more net assets: 1.48B vs. CZAR (1.57M). GLOV has a higher annual dividend yield than CZAR: GLOV (15.252) vs CZAR (12.701). CZAR was incepted earlier than GLOV: CZAR (2 years) vs GLOV (4 years). GLOV (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than CZAR (0.35). CZAR has a higher turnover GLOV (25.00) vs GLOV (25.00).
| CZAR | GLOV | CZAR / GLOV | |
| Gain YTD | 12.701 | 15.252 | 83% |
| Net Assets | 1.57M | 1.48B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.25 | 140% |
| Turnover | 113.00 | 25.00 | 452% |
| Yield | 0.84 | 1.76 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZAR | GLOV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 81% | 9 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 65% | 1 day ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CZAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZAR has been loosely correlated with LIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZAR jumps, then LIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZAR | 100% | N/A | ||
| LIN - CZAR | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| BLK - CZAR | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| FTV - CZAR | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| V - CZAR | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| CPAY - CZAR | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
More | ||||
GLOV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLOV has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLOV jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLOV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLOV | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| MCO - GLOV | 78% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| BN - GLOV | 75% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| L - GLOV | 74% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| LIN - GLOV | 73% Closely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| MA - GLOV | 73% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||