Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZAR vs GLOV
CZAR vs GLOV Comparison
Open Charts CZAR vs GLOV
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
Price$32.71
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.64M
Goldman Sachs ActBt Wld Lw Vl Ps Eq ETF
Price$56.95
Change+$0.11 (+0.19%)
Volume$62.25K
Net Assets1.43B
CZAR vs GLOV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZAR vs. GLOV commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZAR is a StrongBuy and GLOV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLOV has more net assets: 1.43B vs. CZAR (1.64M). GLOV has a higher annual dividend yield than CZAR: GLOV (16.883) vs CZAR (14.059). CZAR was incepted earlier than GLOV: CZAR (2 years) vs GLOV (4 years). GLOV (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than CZAR (0.35). CZAR has a higher turnover GLOV (25.00) vs GLOV (25.00).
| CZAR | GLOV | CZAR / GLOV | |
| Gain YTD | 14.059 | 16.883 | 83% |
| Net Assets | 1.64M | 1.43B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.25 | 140% |
| Turnover | 113.00 | 25.00 | 452% |
| Yield | 0.83 | 1.74 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZAR | GLOV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 65% | 5 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CZAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZAR has been loosely correlated with LIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZAR jumps, then LIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZAR | 100% | N/A | ||
| LIN - CZAR | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| FTV - CZAR | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| CPAY - CZAR | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| BLK - CZAR | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| ADI - CZAR | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
More | ||||
GLOV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLOV has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLOV jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLOV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLOV | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| MCO - GLOV | 77% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| LIN - GLOV | 75% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| BN - GLOV | 74% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| L - GLOV | 73% Closely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| MFC - GLOV | 72% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
More | ||||