Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZAR vs IOO
CZAR vs IOO Comparison
Open Charts CZAR vs IOO
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
Price$32.09
Change-$0.12 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.61M
iShares Global 100 ETF
Price$115.43
Change-$0.59 (-0.51%)
Volume$73.06K
Net Assets7.05B
CZAR vs IOO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZAR vs. IOO commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZAR is a Buy and IOO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IOO has more net assets: 7.05B vs. CZAR (1.61M). IOO has a higher annual dividend yield than CZAR: IOO (15.337) vs CZAR (12.544). CZAR was incepted earlier than IOO: CZAR (2 years) vs IOO (25 years). CZAR (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than IOO (0.40). CZAR has a higher turnover IOO (6.00) vs IOO (6.00).
| CZAR | IOO | CZAR / IOO | |
| Gain YTD | 12.544 | 15.337 | 82% |
| Net Assets | 1.61M | 7.05B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.40 | 87% |
| Turnover | 113.00 | 6.00 | 1,883% |
| Yield | 0.84 | 1.00 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZAR | IOO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CZAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZAR has been loosely correlated with LIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZAR jumps, then LIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZAR | 100% | N/A | ||
| LIN - CZAR | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| FTV - CZAR | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| ADI - CZAR | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| CPAY - CZAR | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| BLK - CZAR | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
More | ||||
IOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IOO has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IOO jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IOO | 100% | -0.51% | ||
| NVDA - IOO | 78% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| AAPL - IOO | 77% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| AMZN - IOO | 77% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| MSFT - IOO | 76% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| EMR - IOO | 75% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
More | ||||