CZASF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Capitalization
198.56M
DSITF
Price
$1.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 23 closing price
Capitalization
777.23M
Ad is loading...

CZASF vs DSITF

Header iconCZASF vs DSITF Comparison
Open Charts CZASF vs DSITFBanner chart's image
China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.47K
Capitalization198.56M
CURRYS
Price$1.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization777.23M
CZASF vs DSITF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CZASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DSITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZASF vs. DSITF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZASF is a Hold and DSITF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CZASF: $0.01 vs. DSITF: $1.18)
Brand notoriety: CZASF and DSITF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZASF: 231% vs. DSITF: 39%
Market capitalization -- CZASF: $198.56M vs. DSITF: $777.23M
CZASF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $198.56M. DSITF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $777.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $9.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDSITF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CZASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DSITF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DSITF is a better buy in the long-term than CZASF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZASF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DSITF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZASF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • DSITF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CZASF is a better buy in the short-term than DSITF.

Price Growth

CZASF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DSITF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+1.91% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DSITF($777M) has a higher market cap than CZASF($199M). CZASF (0.000) and DSITF (0.000) have similar YTD gains . CZASF (-33.49M) and DSITF (-35M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . CZASF has more cash in the bank: 745M vs. DSITF (138M). DSITF has less debt than CZASF: DSITF (1.48B) vs CZASF (18.1B). CZASF has higher revenues than DSITF: CZASF (21B) vs DSITF (9.83B).
CZASFDSITFCZASF / DSITF
Capitalization199M777M26%
EBITDA-33.49M-35M96%
Gain YTD0.0000.000-
P/E RatioN/A12.94-
Revenue21B9.83B214%
Total Cash745M138M540%
Total Debt18.1B1.48B1,223%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZASF vs DSITF: Fundamental Ratings
CZASF
DSITF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9970
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8941
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a1

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DSITF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZASF (52). This means that DSITF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZASF’s over the last 12 months.

DSITF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CZASF (100). This means that DSITF’s stock grew similarly to CZASF’s over the last 12 months.

DSITF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as CZASF (99). This means that DSITF’s stock grew similarly to CZASF’s over the last 12 months.

DSITF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZASF (93). This means that DSITF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZASF’s over the last 12 months.

DSITF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZASF (89). This means that DSITF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZASF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZASFDSITF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CZASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DSITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIFYF0.670.02
+2.37%
Pine Cliff Energy Ltd.
REMYY5.640.12
+2.17%
Remy Cointreau SA
NHHHF0.02N/A
+0.96%
FUELPOSITIVE CORP.
SHECY16.700.15
+0.91%
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.
TTDKY11.92-0.08
-0.67%
TDK Corp.

CZASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CZASF and CMEIF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZASF and CMEIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZASF
1D Price
Change %
CZASF100%
N/A
CMEIF - CZASF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DFRYF - CZASF
22%
Poorly correlated
+12.11%
DUFRY - CZASF
5%
Poorly correlated
+8.18%
DSITF - CZASF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HNORY - CZASF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DSITF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DSITF and JUMSF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DSITF and JUMSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DSITF
1D Price
Change %
DSITF100%
N/A
JUMSF - DSITF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DFRYF - DSITF
8%
Poorly correlated
+12.11%
HLFDY - DSITF
3%
Poorly correlated
+10.10%
IHCPF - DSITF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZASF - DSITF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More