CZASF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Capitalization
183.26M
DSITF
Price
$1.53
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.62B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZASF vs DSITF

Header iconCZASF vs DSITF Comparison
Open Charts CZASF vs DSITFBanner chart's image
China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.47K
Capitalization183.26M
CURRYS
Price$1.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization1.62B
CZASF vs DSITF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DSITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZASF vs. DSITF commentary
Aug 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZASF is a Hold and DSITF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CZASF: $0.01 vs. DSITF: $1.53)
Brand notoriety: CZASF and DSITF are both not notable
CZASF represents the Automotive Aftermarket, while DSITF is part of the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZASF: 100% vs. DSITF: 40%
Market capitalization -- CZASF: $183.26M vs. DSITF: $1.62B
CZASF [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $183.26M. DSITF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $51.39B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $47.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.22B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDSITF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CZASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DSITF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DSITF is a better buy in the long-term than CZASF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DSITF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DSITF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CZASF (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DSITF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.97%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (+1.38% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

@Specialty Stores (+0.80% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DSITF($1.62B) has a higher market cap than CZASF($183M). DSITF YTD gains are higher at: 29.661 vs. CZASF (0.000).
CZASFDSITFCZASF / DSITF
Capitalization183M1.62B11%
EBITDAN/A436M-
Gain YTD0.00029.661-
P/E RatioN/A11.92-
RevenueN/A8.53B-
Total CashN/A108M-
Total DebtN/A935M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZASF vs DSITF: Fundamental Ratings
CZASF
DSITF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2930
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10074
SMR RATING
1..100
9970
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8797
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DSITF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZASF (66). This means that DSITF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZASF’s over the last 12 months.

DSITF's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as CZASF (100). This means that DSITF’s stock grew similarly to CZASF’s over the last 12 months.

DSITF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as CZASF (99). This means that DSITF’s stock grew similarly to CZASF’s over the last 12 months.

DSITF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CZASF (76). This means that DSITF’s stock grew similarly to CZASF’s over the last 12 months.

CZASF's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as DSITF (97). This means that CZASF’s stock grew similarly to DSITF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZASFDSITF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DSITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEGYX44.46N/A
N/A
Touchstone Mid Cap Growth Y
AMIDX14.25N/A
N/A
Amana Developing World Institutional
CCMMX9.76N/A
N/A
Conestoga Mid Cap Investors
AQEAX15.88N/A
N/A
Columbia Disciplined Core A
TVIRX80.53-0.55
-0.68%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Core R4

CZASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CZASF and CMEIF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZASF and CMEIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZASF
1D Price
Change %
CZASF100%
N/A
CMEIF - CZASF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DFRYF - CZASF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DUFRY - CZASF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
DSITF - CZASF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HNORY - CZASF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DSITF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DSITF and JUMSF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DSITF and JUMSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DSITF
1D Price
Change %
DSITF100%
N/A
JUMSF - DSITF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DFRYF - DSITF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLFDY - DSITF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IHCPF - DSITF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZASF - DSITF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More