Advertisement
CZASF vs GPGNF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZASF is a Hold and GPGNF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CZASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGPGNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CZASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GPGNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GPGNF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- GPGNF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
CZASF (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GPGNF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.11%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.25%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Automotive Aftermarket (+0.25% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
@Specialty Stores (+0.69% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| CZASF | GPGNF | CZASF / GPGNF | |
| Capitalization | 184M | 1.61B | 11% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 6.94B | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 14.35 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 35.2B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 4.53B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 16.3B | - |
CZASF | GPGNF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 39 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GPGNF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZASF (65). This means that GPGNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZASF’s over the last 12 months.
GPGNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZASF (100). This means that GPGNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZASF’s over the last 12 months.
GPGNF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as CZASF (99). This means that GPGNF’s stock grew similarly to CZASF’s over the last 12 months.
GPGNF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CZASF (77). This means that GPGNF’s stock grew similarly to CZASF’s over the last 12 months.
GPGNF's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as CZASF (84). This means that GPGNF’s stock grew similarly to CZASF’s over the last 12 months.
| CZASF | GPGNF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 25% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 18% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 8% | 1 day ago 13% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 7% | 1 day ago 13% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EPSKX | 25.09 | 0.05 | +0.20% |
| NYLI Epoch Global Equity Yield Class C | |||
| SSSYX | 497.49 | N/A | N/A |
| State Street Equity 500 Index K | |||
| TLGCX | 9.68 | N/A | N/A |
| Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth C | |||
| SMCIX | 22.32 | N/A | N/A |
| Shelton S&P Smallcap Index Investor | |||
| BBTIX | 13.25 | -0.05 | -0.38% |
| Bridge Builder Tax Managed Intl Eq | |||
CZASF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CZASF and CMEIF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZASF and CMEIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZASF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZASF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CMEIF - CZASF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DFRYF - CZASF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DUFRY - CZASF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
| DSITF - CZASF | 1% Poorly correlated | +2.79% | ||
| HNORY - CZASF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
GPGNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GPGNF and IHCPF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GPGNF and IHCPF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GPGNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPGNF | 100% | N/A | ||
| IHCPF - GPGNF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FKRAF - GPGNF | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.66% | ||
| HLFDY - GPGNF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
| CZASF - GPGNF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DFRYF - GPGNF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||