CZBC
Price
$9.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
55.08M
JFWV
Price
$102.65
Change
-$7.35 (-6.68%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
26.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZBC vs JFWV

Header iconCZBC vs JFWV Comparison
Open Charts CZBC vs JFWVBanner chart's image
Citizens Ban
Price$9.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$620
Capitalization55.08M
JSB Financial
Price$102.65
Change-$7.35 (-6.68%)
Volume$100
Capitalization26.43M
CZBC vs JFWV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CZBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JFWV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZBC vs. JFWV commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZBC is a Hold and JFWV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CZBC: $9.85 vs. JFWV: $102.65)
Brand notoriety: CZBC and JFWV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZBC: 53% vs. JFWV: 42%
Market capitalization -- CZBC: $55.08M vs. JFWV: $26.43M
CZBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $55.08M. JFWV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $26.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $164.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJFWV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CZBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JFWV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CZBC and JFWV are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JFWV’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • JFWV’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CZBC and JFWV are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CZBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JFWV (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CZBC($55.1M) has a higher market cap than JFWV($26.4M). CZBC has higher P/E ratio than JFWV: CZBC (20.10) vs JFWV (6.44). JFWV YTD gains are higher at: 19.324 vs. CZBC (-2.860). JFWV has less debt than CZBC: JFWV (3.27M) vs CZBC (100M). CZBC has higher revenues than JFWV: CZBC (29.7M) vs JFWV (16M).
CZBCJFWVCZBC / JFWV
Capitalization55.1M26.4M209%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.86019.324-15%
P/E Ratio20.106.44312%
Revenue29.7M16M186%
Total Cash20.4MN/A-
Total Debt100M3.27M3,055%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZBC vs JFWV: Fundamental Ratings
CZBC
JFWV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3396
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10047
SMR RATING
1..100
7952
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5858
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1473
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZBC's Valuation (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JFWV (97). This means that CZBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than JFWV’s over the last 12 months.

JFWV's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZBC (100). This means that JFWV’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZBC’s over the last 12 months.

JFWV's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CZBC (79). This means that JFWV’s stock grew similarly to CZBC’s over the last 12 months.

JFWV's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as CZBC (58). This means that JFWV’s stock grew similarly to CZBC’s over the last 12 months.

CZBC's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JFWV (73). This means that CZBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than JFWV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZBCJFWV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
10%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CZBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JFWV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AABVF0.02N/A
N/A
Aberdeen International Inc.
SVCTF264.89N/A
N/A
Senvest Capital Inc.
APCFF0.06N/A
N/A
ATLAS PEARLS LTD
MNILY17.32N/A
N/A
Minor International Public Co., Ltd.
MTUAF418.60-2.90
-0.69%
MTU Aero Engines AG

CZBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZBC has been loosely correlated with UNTN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZBC jumps, then UNTN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZBC
1D Price
Change %
CZBC100%
N/A
UNTN - CZBC
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CZNL - CZBC
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JFWV - CZBC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNND - CZBC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WSSH - CZBC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JFWV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JFWV and BDGSF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JFWV and BDGSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JFWV
1D Price
Change %
JFWV100%
N/A
BDGSF - JFWV
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZBC - JFWV
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNTN - JFWV
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBSI - JFWV
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JFBC - JFWV
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.00%
More