Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMSX vs FSSNX
CZMSX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs FSSNX
CZMSX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. FSSNX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.5B vs. CZMSX (1.12B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than CZMSX: FSSNX (1.05) vs CZMSX (0.57). CZMSX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: CZMSX (10 years) vs FSSNX (15 years). CZMSX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. FSSNX (80.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CZMSX: FSSNX (0) vs CZMSX (100). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.73 vs. CZMSX (6.67). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.40 vs. CZMSX (-15.98).
| CZMSX | FSSNX | CZMSX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.03 | 3,840% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.03 | 4,200% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.621 | 18.013 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 34.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.05 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 22.73 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.77 | 64.23 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.98 | 36.40 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 139.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers