Ad is loading...
CZMSX vs FSSNX
CZMSX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs FSSNX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Eq Strat Inst
Price$13.98
Change-$1.02 (-6.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$23.80
Change-$1.68 (-6.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.17B
CZMSX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. FSSNX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. CZMSX (2.05B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than CZMSX: FSSNX (1.13) vs CZMSX (0.50). CZMSX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: CZMSX (8 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). CZMSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CZMSX: FSSNX (0) vs CZMSX (100). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.02 vs. CZMSX (-5.62). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 103.11 vs. CZMSX (54.26).
| CZMSX | FSSNX | CZMSX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.03 | 3,960% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.03 | 4,640% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.592 | -7.948 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 24.2B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.13 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.62 | -0.02 | 34,657% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.33 | 2.50 | -534% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.26 | 103.11 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...