Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMSX vs FSSNX
CZMSX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs FSSNX
CZMSX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. FSSNX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. CZMSX (1.32B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than CZMSX: FSSNX (1.02) vs CZMSX (0.55). CZMSX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: CZMSX (10 years) vs FSSNX (15 years). CZMSX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CZMSX: FSSNX (0) vs CZMSX (100). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.44 vs. CZMSX (15.48). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 44.28 vs. CZMSX (-9.51).
| CZMSX | FSSNX | CZMSX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.03 | 3,840% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.03 | 4,200% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.473 | 20.700 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 34.9B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.02 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.48 | 35.44 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.23 | 59.43 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.51 | 44.28 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 148.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers