CZNC
Price
$18.87
Change
+$0.06 (+0.32%)
Updated
Dec 19, 11:48 AM (EDT)
28 days until earnings call
HBCP
Price
$45.73
Change
-$3.07 (-6.29%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
40 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CZNC vs HBCP

Header iconCZNC vs HBCP Comparison
Open Charts CZNC vs HBCPBanner chart's image
Citizens & Northern
Price$18.87
Change+$0.06 (+0.32%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Home Ban
Price$45.73
Change-$3.07 (-6.29%)
Volume$22.38K
CapitalizationN/A
CZNC vs HBCP Comparison Chart
Loading...
CZNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZNC vs. HBCP commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZNC is a Hold and HBCP is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CZNC: $18.81 vs. HBCP: $45.73)
Brand notoriety: CZNC and HBCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZNC: 177% vs. HBCP: 105%
Market capitalization -- CZNC: $288.8M vs. HBCP: $302.26M
CZNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $288.8M. HBCP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $302.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZNC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHBCP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CZNC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HBCP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBCP is a better buy in the long-term than CZNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZNC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBCP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZNC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HBCP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CZNC is a better buy in the short-term than HBCP.

Price Growth

CZNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -7.07% price change this week, while HBCP (@Regional Banks) price change was -9.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZNC is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2025.

HBCP is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.77% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCP($302M) and CZNC($289M) have the same market capitalization . CZNC has higher P/E ratio than HBCP: CZNC (11.56) vs HBCP (7.43). HBCP YTD gains are higher at: 11.575 vs. CZNC (-11.219). CZNC has less debt than HBCP: CZNC (209M) vs HBCP (252M). HBCP has higher revenues than CZNC: HBCP (135M) vs CZNC (103M).
CZNCHBCPCZNC / HBCP
Capitalization289M302M96%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-11.21911.575-97%
P/E Ratio11.567.43156%
Revenue103M135M76%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt209M252M83%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZNC vs HBCP: Fundamental Ratings
CZNC
HBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5269
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10046
SMR RATING
1..100
4028
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4126
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HBCP's Valuation (42) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CZNC (53) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to CZNC’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZNC (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZNC’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's SMR Rating (28) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CZNC (40) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to CZNC’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CZNC (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to CZNC’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CZNC (41) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to CZNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZNCHBCP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CZNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UIPMX20.19N/A
N/A
Victory Precious Metals & Minerals Instl
FSYMX9.63N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intl Eq M
TWCAX115.93-3.88
-3.24%
American Century Select A
KLCIX18.59-0.70
-3.63%
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap IS
RMBBX16.87-0.72
-4.09%
RMB Small Cap I

HBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCP has been closely correlated with RBCAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBCP jumps, then RBCAA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCP
1D Price
Change %
HBCP100%
-6.29%
RBCAA - HBCP
77%
Closely correlated
-6.11%
MOFG - HBCP
77%
Closely correlated
-6.11%
THFF - HBCP
76%
Closely correlated
-5.39%
FCBC - HBCP
76%
Closely correlated
-6.78%
MCBS - HBCP
75%
Closely correlated
-5.89%
More