FMBH
Price
$48.52
Change
-$0.72 (-1.46%)
Updated
Oct 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.31B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HBCP
Price
$65.64
Change
-$1.06 (-1.59%)
Updated
Oct 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
527.81M
10 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMBH vs HBCP

FMBH vs HBCP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMBH vs. HBCP commentary
Oct 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMBH is a Hold and HBCP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMBH vs HBCP: Fundamental Ratings
FMBH
HBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5955
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5615
SMR RATING
1..100
2335
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4452
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2933
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HBCP's Valuation (51) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMBH (97) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMBH (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's SMR Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBCP (35) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to HBCP’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBCP (52) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to HBCP’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBCP (33) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to HBCP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMBHHBCP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 10, 2026
Stock price -- (FMBH: $49.24 vs. HBCP: $66.70)
Brand notoriety: FMBH and HBCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMBH: 123% vs. HBCP: 93%
Market capitalization -- FMBH: $1.31B vs. HBCP: $527.81M
FMBH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.31B. HBCP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $527.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMBH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while HBCP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FMBH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HBCP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBCP is a better buy in the long-term than FMBH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMBH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBCP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMBH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HBCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBCP is a better buy in the short-term than FMBH.

Price Growth

FMBH (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.08% price change this week, while HBCP (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMBH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

HBCP is expected to report earnings on Oct 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HBCP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVE31.490.86
+2.81%
Cenovus Energy
VNTG0.640.02
+2.52%
Vantage Corp.
FND46.500.68
+1.48%
Floor & Decor Holdings
AVEX14.21-0.02
-0.14%
AEVEX Corp
CURV2.36-0.17
-6.72%
Torrid Holdings

FMBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMBH has been closely correlated with UVSP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMBH jumps, then UVSP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBH
1D Price
Change %
FMBH100%
+0.78%
UVSP - FMBH
86%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
BY - FMBH
86%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
IBCP - FMBH
85%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
CCNE - FMBH
85%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
SHBI - FMBH
85%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
More

HBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCP has been closely correlated with FBIZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBCP jumps, then FBIZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCP
1D Price
Change %
HBCP100%
+0.91%
FBIZ - HBCP
81%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
UVSP - HBCP
81%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
GSBC - HBCP
81%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
FMBH - HBCP
80%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
CCNE - HBCP
80%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
More