It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CZR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CZR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CZR (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +4.13% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.98%.
CZR is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.
Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
CZR | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CZR | FBND | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago43% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago42% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago43% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago43% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago52% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago54% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 2 days ago51% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago75% | 9 days ago49% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago54% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago62% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FCUS | 33.89 | 1.16 | +3.55% |
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | |||
HAPS | 31.98 | 0.33 | +1.04% |
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Sm CapETF | |||
JPUS | 121.71 | 0.65 | +0.54% |
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Eq ETF | |||
ILCG | 89.84 | 0.39 | +0.44% |
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | |||
ISHP | 36.31 | -0.67 | -1.81% |
First Trust S-Network Glb E-Com ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FBND and CZR have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBND and CZR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBND | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FBND | 100% | +0.18% | ||
CZR - FBND | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
CRC - FBND | -1% Poorly correlated | +0.64% | ||
EQT - FBND | -8% Poorly correlated | +1.30% |