CZR
Price
$25.33
Change
-$0.12 (-0.47%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
9.34B
17 days until earnings call
GMBLP
Price
$0.08
Change
+$0.02 (+33.33%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

CZR vs GMBLP

Header iconCZR vs GMBLP Comparison
Open Charts CZR vs GMBLPBanner chart's image
Caesars Entertainment
Price$25.33
Change-$0.12 (-0.47%)
Volume$4.47M
Capitalization9.34B
Esports Entertainment Group
Price$0.08
Change+$0.02 (+33.33%)
Volume$330
CapitalizationN/A
CZR vs GMBLP Comparison Chart
Loading...
CZR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZR vs. GMBLP commentary
Apr 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZR is a Hold and GMBLP is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CZR: $25.33 vs. GMBLP: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: CZR and GMBLP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZR: 74% vs. GMBLP: 15%
Market capitalization -- CZR: $9.34B vs. GMBLP: $0
CZR [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $9.34B. GMBLP’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGMBLP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CZR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GMBLP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMBLP is a better buy in the long-term than CZR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CZR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CZR (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +9.28% price change this week, while GMBLP (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +32.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZR is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+0.57% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMBLP YTD gains are higher at: 57.692 vs. CZR (-24.207). CZR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.56B vs. GMBLP (-25.74M). CZR has more cash in the bank: 1.01B vs. GMBLP (303K). GMBLP has less debt than CZR: GMBLP (70.4K) vs CZR (25.1B). CZR has higher revenues than GMBLP: CZR (11.5B) vs GMBLP (16.1M).
CZRGMBLPCZR / GMBLP
Capitalization9.34BN/A-
EBITDA3.56B-25.74M-13,811%
Gain YTD-24.20757.692-42%
P/E Ratio11.86N/A-
Revenue11.5B16.1M71,429%
Total Cash1.01B303K331,683%
Total Debt25.1B70.4K35,653,409%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZR: Fundamental Ratings
CZR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
59
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CZR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPXV57.541.10
+1.94%
ProShares S&P 500® ex-Health Care
RSPR32.990.43
+1.33%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Real Estt ETF
XSD176.772.15
+1.23%
SPDR® S&P Semiconductor ETF
EPOL27.250.32
+1.19%
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
VCLT72.440.32
+0.44%
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bd ETF

GMBLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMBLP and CPHC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMBLP and CPHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMBLP
1D Price
Change %
GMBLP100%
+32.47%
CPHC - GMBLP
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
CNTY - GMBLP
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
CZR - GMBLP
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
VAC - GMBLP
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
LTRY - GMBLP
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.85%
More