CZWI
Price
$16.40
Change
+$0.26 (+1.61%)
Updated
Sep 17, 12:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
160.59M
40 days until earnings call
FSFG
Price
$27.25
Change
+$0.26 (+0.96%)
Updated
Sep 17, 12:08 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
187.53M
36 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZWI vs FSFG

Header iconCZWI vs FSFG Comparison
Open Charts CZWI vs FSFGBanner chart's image
Citizens Community Ban
Price$16.40
Change+$0.26 (+1.61%)
Volume$500
Capitalization160.59M
First Savings Financial Group
Price$27.25
Change+$0.26 (+0.96%)
Volume$100
Capitalization187.53M
CZWI vs FSFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CZWI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZWI vs. FSFG commentary
Sep 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZWI is a Hold and FSFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CZWI: $16.14 vs. FSFG: $26.99)
Brand notoriety: CZWI and FSFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZWI: 50% vs. FSFG: 36%
Market capitalization -- CZWI: $160.59M vs. FSFG: $187.53M
CZWI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $160.59M. FSFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $187.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZWI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CZWI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CZWI is a better buy in the long-term than FSFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZWI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSFG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZWI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FSFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CZWI is a better buy in the short-term than FSFG.

Price Growth

CZWI (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.16% price change this week, while FSFG (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZWI is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.47% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSFG($188M) has a higher market cap than CZWI($161M). CZWI has higher P/E ratio than FSFG: CZWI (13.02) vs FSFG (8.71). FSFG YTD gains are higher at: 3.524 vs. CZWI (1.375). CZWI has less debt than FSFG: CZWI (61.7M) vs FSFG (464M). FSFG has higher revenues than CZWI: FSFG (80.6M) vs CZWI (57.9M).
CZWIFSFGCZWI / FSFG
Capitalization161M188M86%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.3753.52439%
P/E Ratio13.028.71149%
Revenue57.9M80.6M72%
Total CashN/A18.6M-
Total Debt61.7M464M13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZWI vs FSFG: Fundamental Ratings
CZWI
FSFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7210
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3749
SMR RATING
1..100
6247
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4751
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2495
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSFG's Valuation (27) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZWI (47) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

CZWI's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZWI’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's SMR Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZWI (62) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

CZWI's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZWI’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

CZWI's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSFG (95) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZWI’s stock grew significantly faster than FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZWIFSFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CZWI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKEAY1.50N/A
N/A
Bank of East Asia Limited
BNCZF11.75N/A
N/A
Banco BPM Societa Per Azioni
SOLTF6.78N/A
N/A
Nxera Pharma Co.,Ltd.
ACITF0.20N/A
N/A
Asian Citrus Holdings Ltd.
CGEH2.51-0.22
-8.06%
Capstone Green Energy Holdings Inc.

CZWI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZWI has been loosely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZWI jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZWI
1D Price
Change %
CZWI100%
-0.80%
SHBI - CZWI
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
FCCO - CZWI
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
HBAN - CZWI
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
THFF - CZWI
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
UCB - CZWI
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
More

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
+0.41%
SHBI - FSFG
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
FUNC - FSFG
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
CZWI - FSFG
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
UBFO - FSFG
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
NWBI - FSFG
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
More