CZWI
Price
$14.77
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
127.47M
One day until earnings call
FSFG
Price
$25.97
Change
+$0.04 (+0.15%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
115.29M
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZWI vs FSFG

Header iconCZWI vs FSFG Comparison
Open Charts CZWI vs FSFGBanner chart's image
Citizens Community Ban
Price$14.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$17.59K
Capitalization127.47M
First Savings Financial Group
Price$25.97
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
Volume$21.03K
Capitalization115.29M
CZWI vs FSFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CZWI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZWI vs. FSFG commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZWI is a Hold and FSFG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CZWI: $14.77 vs. FSFG: $25.97)
Brand notoriety: CZWI and FSFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZWI: 28% vs. FSFG: 51%
Market capitalization -- CZWI: $127.47M vs. FSFG: $115.29M
CZWI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $127.47M. FSFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $115.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZWI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSFG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CZWI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the long-term than CZWI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZWI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSFG’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZWI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FSFG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the short-term than CZWI.

Price Growth

CZWI (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.01% price change this week, while FSFG (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZWI is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.49% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CZWI($127M) has a higher market cap than FSFG($115M). FSFG has higher P/E ratio than CZWI: FSFG (18.62) vs CZWI (9.75). FSFG YTD gains are higher at: -0.977 vs. CZWI (-7.230). CZWI has less debt than FSFG: CZWI (147M) vs FSFG (405M). FSFG has higher revenues than CZWI: FSFG (82.3M) vs CZWI (58.5M).
CZWIFSFGCZWI / FSFG
Capitalization127M115M110%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.230-0.977740%
P/E Ratio9.7518.6252%
Revenue58.5M82.3M71%
Total CashN/A17.5M-
Total Debt147M405M36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZWI vs FSFG: Fundamental Ratings
CZWI
FSFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
994
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4048
SMR RATING
1..100
5141
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3793
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZWI's Valuation (27) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZWI’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

CZWI's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZWI’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's SMR Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZWI (51) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZWI (51) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

CZWI's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSFG (93) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZWI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZWIFSFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CZWI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SJMHF0.390.05
+14.91%
SJM Holdings Ltd.
NWBO0.260.01
+2.87%
Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc.
HLDCY3.440.06
+1.67%
Henderson Land Development Co., Ltd.
LEIC0.15N/A
N/A
Lead Innovation Corporation
FDCFF0.03N/A
-3.21%
Forum Energy Metals Corp.

CZWI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZWI has been loosely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZWI jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZWI
1D Price
Change %
CZWI100%
N/A
UCB - CZWI
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
SHBI - CZWI
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
EQBK - CZWI
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
FITB - CZWI
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
THFF - CZWI
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
More

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
+0.15%
SHBI - FSFG
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
FUNC - FSFG
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
CZWI - FSFG
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TCBI - FSFG
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
AUB - FSFG
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
More