Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DAABX vs SSGSX
DAABX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts DAABX vs SSGSX
DFA US Sustainability Targeted Val Instl
Price$20.89
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets528.44M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.93
Change-$0.05 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.58B
DAABX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DAABX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAABX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.58B vs. DAABX (528M). DAABX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: DAABX (1.18) vs SSGSX (0.47). DAABX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: DAABX (5 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than DAABX (0.35). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DAABX (16.00). DAABX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: DAABX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). DAABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.72 vs. SSGSX (-4.33). DAABX return over 5 years is better than : 96.10 vs. SSGSX (27.16).
| DAABX | SSGSX | DAABX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.26 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.26 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.799 | 1.185 | 574% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 528M | 5.58B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 0.47 | 249% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.72 | -4.33 | -201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.00 | 3.52 | 1,136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.10 | 27.16 | 354% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement