Ad is loading...
DAIUF
Price
$20.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
KTWIY
Price
$86.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

DAIUF vs KTWIY

Header iconDAIUF vs KTWIY Comparison
Open Charts DAIUF vs KTWIYBanner chart's image
Daifuku
Price$20.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Kurita Water Industries
Price$86.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$445
CapitalizationN/A
DAIUF vs KTWIY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DAIUF vs. KTWIY commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAIUF is a Hold and KTWIY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (DAIUF: $20.75 vs. KTWIY: $86.12)
Brand notoriety: DAIUF and KTWIY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAIUF: 22% vs. KTWIY: 28%
Market capitalization -- DAIUF: $8.15B vs. KTWIY: $4.62B
DAIUF [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $8.15B. KTWIY’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $4.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAIUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKTWIY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DAIUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KTWIY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DAIUF is a better buy in the long-term than KTWIY.

Price Growth

DAIUF (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KTWIY (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +8.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.88%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-0.80% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DAIUF($8.15B) has a higher market cap than KTWIY($4.62B). KTWIY has higher P/E ratio than DAIUF: KTWIY (31.79) vs DAIUF (26.04). KTWIY YTD gains are higher at: 10.817 vs. DAIUF (4.324). KTWIY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 72.3B vs. DAIUF (65.4B). DAIUF has higher revenues than KTWIY: DAIUF (578B) vs KTWIY (380B).
DAIUFKTWIYDAIUF / KTWIY
Capitalization8.15B4.62B177%
EBITDA65.4B72.3B90%
Gain YTD4.32410.81740%
P/E Ratio26.0431.7982%
Revenue578B380B152%
Total CashN/A54B-
Total DebtN/A106B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAIUF: Fundamental Ratings
DAIUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
85
SMR RATING
1..100
59
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARYVX13.750.03
+0.22%
American Century Global Real Estate Inv
CVSCX15.27-0.03
-0.20%
Calamos Market Neutral Income C
EAISX14.44-0.03
-0.21%
Parametric International Equity A
MWEFX49.56-0.48
-0.96%
MFS Global Equity A
PFSVX17.41-0.33
-1.86%
iMGP Small Company Fund Instl Cl

DAIUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DAIUF and VOYJF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DAIUF and VOYJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAIUF
1D Price
Change %
DAIUF100%
N/A
VOYJF - DAIUF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KTWIY - DAIUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LECO - DAIUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
DFKCY - DAIUF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
DURYY - DAIUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KTWIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KTWIY and YOKEY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTWIY and YOKEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KTWIY
1D Price
Change %
KTWIY100%
N/A
YOKEY - KTWIY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DFKCY - KTWIY
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
THKLY - KTWIY
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.34%
KRNT - KTWIY
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
ATS - KTWIY
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
More