DAN
Price
$19.98
Change
+$0.65 (+3.36%)
Updated
Oct 21, 03:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.54B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
DNZOF
Price
$14.66
Change
-$0.38 (-2.53%)
Updated
Oct 20 closing price
Capitalization
40.38B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DAN vs DNZOF

Header iconDAN vs DNZOF Comparison
Open Charts DAN vs DNZOFBanner chart's image
Dana
Price$19.98
Change+$0.65 (+3.36%)
Volume$900
Capitalization2.54B
Denso
Price$14.66
Change-$0.38 (-2.53%)
Volume$945
Capitalization40.38B
DAN vs DNZOF Comparison Chart in %
DAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DNZOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DAN vs. DNZOF commentary
Oct 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAN is a Hold and DNZOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 21, 2025
Stock price -- (DAN: $19.34 vs. DNZOF: $14.66)
Brand notoriety: DAN and DNZOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAN: 97% vs. DNZOF: 48%
Market capitalization -- DAN: $2.54B vs. DNZOF: $40.38B
DAN [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.54B. DNZOF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $40.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $85.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDNZOF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • DAN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DNZOF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, DNZOF is a better buy in the long-term than DAN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DNZOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DNZOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DAN is a better buy in the short-term than DNZOF.

Price Growth

DAN (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +5.80% price change this week, while DNZOF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -2.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.50% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNZOF($40.4B) has a higher market cap than DAN($2.54B). DAN has higher P/E ratio than DNZOF: DAN (96.70) vs DNZOF (15.19). DAN YTD gains are higher at: 70.514 vs. DNZOF (-0.912). DNZOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 980B vs. DAN (739M). DNZOF has more cash in the bank: 1.1T vs. DAN (486M). DAN has less debt than DNZOF: DAN (3.4B) vs DNZOF (699B). DNZOF has higher revenues than DAN: DNZOF (7.16T) vs DAN (9.94B).
DANDNZOFDAN / DNZOF
Capitalization2.54B40.4B6%
EBITDA739M980B0%
Gain YTD70.514-0.912-7,730%
P/E Ratio96.7015.19636%
Revenue9.94B7.16T0%
Total Cash486M1.1T0%
Total Debt3.4B699B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAN vs DNZOF: Fundamental Ratings
DAN
DNZOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5279
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6474
SMR RATING
1..100
921
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4250
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4532
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DNZOF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as DAN (41) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that DNZOF’s stock grew similarly to DAN’s over the last 12 months.

DAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as DNZOF (74) in the null industry. This means that DAN’s stock grew similarly to DNZOF’s over the last 12 months.

DNZOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DAN (92) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that DNZOF’s stock grew significantly faster than DAN’s over the last 12 months.

DAN's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as DNZOF (50) in the null industry. This means that DAN’s stock grew similarly to DNZOF’s over the last 12 months.

DNZOF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as DAN (45) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that DNZOF’s stock grew similarly to DAN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DANDNZOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DNZOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DQ27.430.63
+2.35%
Daqo New Energy Corp
NCMI4.320.07
+1.65%
National CineMedia
TVACU11.80N/A
N/A
Texas Ventures Acquisition III Corp
KBSX1.49-0.04
-2.42%
FST Corp
PSO14.61-0.37
-2.47%
Pearson plc

DNZOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DNZOF and CTTAF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNZOF and CTTAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNZOF
1D Price
Change %
DNZOF100%
-2.49%
CTTAF - DNZOF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
DNZOY - DNZOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.32%
DAN - DNZOF
17%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
MBLY - DNZOF
13%
Poorly correlated
+4.78%
MNRO - DNZOF
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.53%
More