DAN
Price
$19.92
Change
-$0.12 (-0.60%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
2.63B
23 days until earnings call
DNZOF
Price
$14.72
Change
-$0.61 (-3.98%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
39B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DAN vs DNZOF

Header iconDAN vs DNZOF Comparison
Open Charts DAN vs DNZOFBanner chart's image
Dana
Price$19.92
Change-$0.12 (-0.60%)
Volume$1.63M
Capitalization2.63B
Denso
Price$14.72
Change-$0.61 (-3.98%)
Volume$2.35K
Capitalization39B
DAN vs DNZOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DNZOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DAN vs. DNZOF commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAN is a StrongBuy and DNZOF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (DAN: $19.92 vs. DNZOF: $15.28)
Brand notoriety: DAN and DNZOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAN: 85% vs. DNZOF: 33%
Market capitalization -- DAN: $2.63B vs. DNZOF: $39B
DAN [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.63B. DNZOF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $90.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDNZOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DAN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DNZOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DAN is a better buy in the long-term than DNZOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DNZOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DAN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DNZOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DNZOF is a better buy in the short-term than DAN.

Price Growth

DAN (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -0.94% price change this week, while DNZOF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +1.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAN is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.43% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNZOF($39B) has a higher market cap than DAN($2.63B). DAN has higher P/E ratio than DNZOF: DAN (99.60) vs DNZOF (15.77). DAN YTD gains are higher at: 75.627 vs. DNZOF (-0.541). DNZOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 980B vs. DAN (739M). DNZOF has more cash in the bank: 1.1T vs. DAN (486M). DAN has less debt than DNZOF: DAN (3.4B) vs DNZOF (699B). DNZOF has higher revenues than DAN: DNZOF (7.16T) vs DAN (9.94B).
DANDNZOFDAN / DNZOF
Capitalization2.63B39B7%
EBITDA739M980B0%
Gain YTD75.627-0.541-13,991%
P/E Ratio99.6015.77631%
Revenue9.94B7.16T0%
Total Cash486M1.1T0%
Total Debt3.4B699B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAN vs DNZOF: Fundamental Ratings
DAN
DNZOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6970
SMR RATING
1..100
921
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4156
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3877
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DNZOF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as DAN (48) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that DNZOF’s stock grew similarly to DAN’s over the last 12 months.

DAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as DNZOF (70) in the null industry. This means that DAN’s stock grew similarly to DNZOF’s over the last 12 months.

DNZOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DAN (92) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that DNZOF’s stock grew significantly faster than DAN’s over the last 12 months.

DAN's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as DNZOF (56) in the null industry. This means that DAN’s stock grew similarly to DNZOF’s over the last 12 months.

DAN's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DNZOF (77) in the null industry. This means that DAN’s stock grew somewhat faster than DNZOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DANDNZOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DNZOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RIGBX44.33N/A
N/A
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc R2
NBGUX32.00N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Adv
LKSCX22.75N/A
N/A
LKCM Small Cap Equity Instl
TQSAX24.93N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq Adv
JSMVX18.20N/A
N/A
Jackson Square SMID-Cap Growth Inv

DNZOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DNZOF and CTTAF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNZOF and CTTAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNZOF
1D Price
Change %
DNZOF100%
-3.98%
CTTAF - DNZOF
29%
Poorly correlated
+7.08%
DNZOY - DNZOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
DAN - DNZOF
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
MBLY - DNZOF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
MNRO - DNZOF
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.69%
More