DAN
Price
$29.18
Change
+$0.77 (+2.71%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
3.14B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MGA
Price
$65.35
Change
+$0.46 (+0.71%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
17.7B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DAN vs MGA

DAN vs MGA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DAN vs. MGA commentary
Jun 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAN is a Hold and MGA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 21, 2026
Stock price -- (DAN: $29.18 vs. MGA: $65.35)
Brand notoriety: DAN and MGA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAN: 426% vs. MGA: 102%
Market capitalization -- DAN: $3.14B vs. MGA: $17.7B
DAN [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $3.14B. MGA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $17.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $71.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DAN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MGA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DAN and MGA are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MGA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DAN and MGA are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DAN (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -3.09% price change this week, while MGA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAN is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.

MGA is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.93% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGA($17.7B) has a higher market cap than DAN($3.14B). DAN has higher P/E ratio than MGA: DAN (71.32) vs MGA (27.57). MGA (24.535) and DAN (23.665) have similar YTD gains . MGA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.38B vs. DAN (516M). MGA has more cash in the bank: 1.61B vs. DAN (477M). DAN has less debt than MGA: DAN (1.54B) vs MGA (6.7B). MGA has higher revenues than DAN: MGA (42.3B) vs DAN (7.59B).
DANMGADAN / MGA
Capitalization3.14B17.7B18%
EBITDA516M3.38B15%
Gain YTD23.66524.53596%
P/E Ratio71.3227.57259%
Revenue7.59B42.3B18%
Total Cash477M1.61B30%
Total Debt1.54B6.7B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAN vs MGA: Fundamental Ratings
DAN
MGA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7125
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78100
SMR RATING
1..100
1684
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
755
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
404

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGA's Valuation (8) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as DAN (19). This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to DAN’s over the last 12 months.

DAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MGA (100). This means that DAN’s stock grew similarly to MGA’s over the last 12 months.

DAN's SMR Rating (16) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGA (84). This means that DAN’s stock grew significantly faster than MGA’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as DAN (49). This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to DAN’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is significantly better than the same rating for DAN (75). This means that MGA’s stock grew significantly faster than DAN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DANMGA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MGA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FHDG36.240.24
+0.65%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Qt Dyn Buffr ETF
GBAB14.210.08
+0.57%
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal
TAXI51.330.13
+0.25%
Northern Trust Intermediate Tx Exm BdETF
PBTP26.300.04
+0.15%
Invesco 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF
FLCB21.370.03
+0.14%
Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF

DAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAN has been loosely correlated with PHIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DAN jumps, then PHIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAN
1D Price
Change %
DAN100%
+2.71%
PHIN - DAN
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.10%
LEA - DAN
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
SMP - DAN
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.19%
ALSN - DAN
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
DCH - DAN
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.27%
More