DAR vs DTEAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAR is a Buy and DTEAF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DAR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDTEAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- DAR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- DTEAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DAR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- DAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
DAR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -1.38% price change this week, while DTEAF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -3.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.36%.
Reported Earning Dates
DAR is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.
DTEAF is expected to report earnings on Jun 17, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.23% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| DAR | DTEAF | DAR / DTEAF | |
| Capitalization | 7.43B | 11.2M | 66,348% |
| EBITDA | 1.48B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.589 | 49.638 | -13% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.38 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 6.79B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 127M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 4.64B | N/A | - |
DAR | DTEAF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DTEAF's Valuation (76) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as DAR (84) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that DTEAF’s stock grew similarly to DAR’s over the last 12 months.
DAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as DTEAF (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that DAR’s stock grew similarly to DTEAF’s over the last 12 months.
DAR's SMR Rating (81) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as DTEAF (95) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that DAR’s stock grew similarly to DTEAF’s over the last 12 months.
DTEAF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DAR (74) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that DTEAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DAR’s over the last 12 months.
DAR's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is significantly better than the same rating for DTEAF (95) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that DAR’s stock grew significantly faster than DTEAF’s over the last 12 months.
| DAR | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% |
DAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DAR and SAPIF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DAR and SAPIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAR | 100% | -5.01% | ||
| SAPIF - DAR | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CENTA - DAR | 29% Poorly correlated | -3.10% | ||
| LWAY - DAR | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| CENT - DAR | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.44% | ||
| INGR - DAR | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.81% | ||
More | ||||
DTEAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DTEAF and PRRFY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DTEAF and PRRFY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DTEAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTEAF | 100% | +4.42% | ||
| PRRFY - DTEAF | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.77% | ||
| SWSSF - DTEAF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DAR - DTEAF | 22% Poorly correlated | -5.01% | ||
| RMCF - DTEAF | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.46% | ||
| NAII - DTEAF | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
More | ||||