DAR
Price
$31.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
7.43B
81 days until earnings call
FTLF
Price
$14.00
Change
+$0.10 (+0.72%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
109.28M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DAR vs FTLF

Header iconDAR vs FTLF Comparison
Open Charts DAR vs FTLFBanner chart's image
Darling Ingredients
Price$31.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.47M
Capitalization7.43B
FitLife Brands
Price$14.00
Change+$0.10 (+0.72%)
Volume$6.16K
Capitalization109.28M
DAR vs FTLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DAR vs. FTLF commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAR is a Hold and FTLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (DAR: $31.50 vs. FTLF: $14.00)
Brand notoriety: DAR and FTLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAR: 104% vs. FTLF: 30%
Market capitalization -- DAR: $7.43B vs. FTLF: $109.28M
DAR [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $7.43B. FTLF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $109.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFTLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DAR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FTLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FTLF is a better buy in the long-term than DAR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DAR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FTLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FTLF is a better buy in the short-term than DAR.

Price Growth

DAR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -10.84% price change this week, while FTLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -3.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAR is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

FTLF is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.31% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DAR($7.43B) has a higher market cap than FTLF($109M). FTLF has higher P/E ratio than DAR: FTLF (22.68) vs DAR (11.38). DAR YTD gains are higher at: -6.500 vs. FTLF (-14.110). DAR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.48B vs. FTLF (6.66M). DAR has more cash in the bank: 127M vs. FTLF (7.34M). FTLF has less debt than DAR: FTLF (11.4M) vs DAR (4.64B). DAR has higher revenues than FTLF: DAR (6.79B) vs FTLF (44.8M).
DARFTLFDAR / FTLF
Capitalization7.43B109M6,817%
EBITDA1.48B6.66M22,224%
Gain YTD-6.500-14.11046%
P/E Ratio11.3822.6850%
Revenue6.79B44.8M15,152%
Total Cash127M7.34M1,730%
Total Debt4.64B11.4M40,675%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAR vs FTLF: Fundamental Ratings
DAR
FTLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7467
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8020
SMR RATING
1..100
8033
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
570
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FTLF's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as DAR (86) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FTLF’s stock grew similarly to DAR’s over the last 12 months.

FTLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DAR (80) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FTLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DAR’s over the last 12 months.

FTLF's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DAR (80) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FTLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DAR’s over the last 12 months.

FTLF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as DAR (62) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FTLF’s stock grew similarly to DAR’s over the last 12 months.

DAR's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTLF (70) in the null industry. This means that DAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DARFTLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IGM101.860.28
+0.28%
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
MVRL13.71N/A
N/A
ETRACS Mnthly Py 1.5X Lvgd Mtg REIT ETN
CONL27.32N/A
N/A
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF
YALL40.13-0.13
-0.31%
God Bless America ETF
JCE14.86-0.16
-1.07%
Nuveen Core Equity Alpha Fund

DAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DAR and SAPIF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DAR and SAPIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAR
1D Price
Change %
DAR100%
N/A
SAPIF - DAR
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CENTA - DAR
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LWAY - DAR
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CENT - DAR
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
INGR - DAR
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
More

FTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTLF and BRBR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTLF and BRBR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTLF
1D Price
Change %
FTLF100%
+0.72%
BRBR - FTLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DAR - FTLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYND - FTLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
FARM - FTLF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCRA - FTLF
14%
Poorly correlated
+4.16%
More