DAR
Price
$34.10
Change
-$0.23 (-0.67%)
Updated
Aug 29, 03:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.43B
74 days until earnings call
RSGUF
Price
$4.57
Change
-$0.02 (-0.44%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
585.25M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DAR vs RSGUF

Header iconDAR vs RSGUF Comparison
Open Charts DAR vs RSGUFBanner chart's image
Darling Ingredients
Price$34.10
Change-$0.23 (-0.67%)
Volume$200
Capitalization5.43B
Rogers Sugar
Price$4.57
Change-$0.02 (-0.44%)
Volume$1.18K
Capitalization585.25M
DAR vs RSGUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DAR vs. RSGUF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAR is a StrongBuy and RSGUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (DAR: $34.33 vs. RSGUF: $4.57)
Brand notoriety: DAR and RSGUF are both not notable
DAR represents the Food: Major Diversified, while RSGUF is part of the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAR: 69% vs. RSGUF: 21%
Market capitalization -- DAR: $5.43B vs. RSGUF: $585.25M
DAR [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $5.43B. RSGUF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $585.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $239.72B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $79.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.07B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $14.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRSGUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DAR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RSGUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSGUF is a better buy in the long-term than DAR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSGUF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • RSGUF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RSGUF is a better buy in the short-term than DAR.

Price Growth

DAR (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +7.89% price change this week, while RSGUF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +771.98%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAR is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.55% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.54% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DAR($5.43B) has a higher market cap than RSGUF($585M). DAR has higher P/E ratio than RSGUF: DAR (52.82) vs RSGUF (12.90). RSGUF YTD gains are higher at: 11.736 vs. DAR (1.900). DAR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 801M vs. RSGUF (145M). DAR has more cash in the bank: 94.6M vs. RSGUF (26.6M). RSGUF has less debt than DAR: RSGUF (381M) vs DAR (4.22B). DAR has higher revenues than RSGUF: DAR (5.7B) vs RSGUF (1.3B).
DARRSGUFDAR / RSGUF
Capitalization5.43B585M928%
EBITDA801M145M552%
Gain YTD1.90011.73616%
P/E Ratio52.8212.90409%
Revenue5.7B1.3B440%
Total Cash94.6M26.6M356%
Total Debt4.22B381M1,107%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAR vs RSGUF: Fundamental Ratings
DAR
RSGUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
791
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8963
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RSGUF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DAR (89) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that RSGUF’s stock grew significantly faster than DAR’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as DAR (89) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to DAR’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DAR (100) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to DAR’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as DAR (58) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to DAR’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DAR (100) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to DAR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DARRSGUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MISEX39.00N/A
N/A
Midas Special Opportunities
RYPCX7.36N/A
N/A
Royce Small-Cap Fund Consult
MPSSX21.67N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Small Cap Multi-Strategy M
FKUQX25.13N/A
N/A
Franklin Utilities A
AWSSX17.73N/A
N/A
Invesco Global Core Equity R6

DAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DAR and SAPIF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DAR and SAPIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAR
1D Price
Change %
DAR100%
-0.32%
SAPIF - DAR
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
FAMI - DAR
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
K - DAR
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
USNA - DAR
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%
CENT - DAR
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
More

RSGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSGUF and LW have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSGUF and LW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSGUF
1D Price
Change %
RSGUF100%
-0.44%
LW - RSGUF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
DAR - RSGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
CIADY - RSGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
SAPIF - RSGUF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
PRBZF - RSGUF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More