DAR
Price
$30.64
Change
-$0.05 (-0.16%)
Updated
Aug 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.43B
95 days until earnings call
RSGUF
Price
$4.12
Change
-$0.01 (-0.24%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
501.75M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DAR vs RSGUF

Header iconDAR vs RSGUF Comparison
Open Charts DAR vs RSGUFBanner chart's image
Darling Ingredients
Price$30.64
Change-$0.05 (-0.16%)
Volume$15.05K
Capitalization7.43B
Rogers Sugar
Price$4.12
Change-$0.01 (-0.24%)
Volume$3.56K
Capitalization501.75M
DAR vs RSGUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DAR vs. RSGUF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAR is a Hold and RSGUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (DAR: $30.69 vs. RSGUF: $4.11)
Brand notoriety: DAR and RSGUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAR: 92% vs. RSGUF: 5%
Market capitalization -- DAR: $7.43B vs. RSGUF: $501.75M
DAR [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $7.43B. RSGUF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $501.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRSGUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DAR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RSGUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSGUF is a better buy in the long-term than DAR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSGUF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RSGUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DAR is a better buy in the short-term than RSGUF.

Price Growth

DAR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -5.22% price change this week, while RSGUF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAR is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.61% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DAR($7.43B) has a higher market cap than RSGUF($502M). RSGUF has higher P/E ratio than DAR: RSGUF (12.55) vs DAR (11.38). RSGUF YTD gains are higher at: 0.611 vs. DAR (-8.905). DAR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.48B vs. RSGUF (119M). DAR has more cash in the bank: 127M vs. RSGUF (5.83M). RSGUF has less debt than DAR: RSGUF (445M) vs DAR (4.64B). DAR has higher revenues than RSGUF: DAR (6.79B) vs RSGUF (1.13B).
DARRSGUFDAR / RSGUF
Capitalization7.43B502M1,480%
EBITDA1.48B119M1,245%
Gain YTD-8.9050.611-1,457%
P/E Ratio11.3812.5591%
Revenue6.79B1.13B600%
Total Cash127M5.83M2,177%
Total Debt4.64B445M1,042%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAR vs RSGUF: Fundamental Ratings
DAR
RSGUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6069
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8869
SMR RATING
1..100
8555
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
561
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RSGUF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DAR (89) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that RSGUF’s stock grew significantly faster than DAR’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as DAR (88) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to DAR’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as DAR (85) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to DAR’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as DAR (87) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to DAR’s over the last 12 months.

DAR's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RSGUF (61) in the null industry. This means that DAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than RSGUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DARRSGUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CPLSX17.840.05
+0.28%
Calamos Phineus Long/Short A
CIMEX26.570.03
+0.11%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529E
NDGCX23.87N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Dividend Growth C
MUOSX32.57N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Instl US Core R6
GQEPX21.52N/A
N/A
GQG Partners US Select Quality Eq Inv

RSGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSGUF and LW have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSGUF and LW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSGUF
1D Price
Change %
RSGUF100%
N/A
LW - RSGUF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
DAR - RSGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.81%
CIADY - RSGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
SAPIF - RSGUF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
PRBZF - RSGUF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
More