It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DAR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAPIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DAR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAPIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
DAR is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
DAR | SAPIF | DAR / SAPIF | |
Capitalization | 4.85B | 9.6B | 50% |
EBITDA | 886M | 730M | 121% |
Gain YTD | -9.083 | 34.044 | -27% |
P/E Ratio | 47.12 | 42.57 | 111% |
Revenue | 5.68B | 19.1B | 30% |
Total Cash | 81.5M | 257M | 32% |
Total Debt | 4.14B | 3.59B | 115% |
DAR | SAPIF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SAPIF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DAR (89) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that SAPIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DAR’s over the last 12 months.
DAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as SAPIF (100) in the null industry. This means that DAR’s stock grew similarly to SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.
DAR's SMR Rating (86) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as SAPIF (92) in the null industry. This means that DAR’s stock grew similarly to SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.
SAPIF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DAR (84) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that SAPIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DAR’s over the last 12 months.
DAR's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as SAPIF (28) in the null industry. This means that DAR’s stock grew similarly to SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.
DAR | SAPIF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 4 days ago56% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago72% | 4 days ago53% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago52% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago67% | 4 days ago55% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago72% | 4 days ago50% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago55% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago75% | 4 days ago51% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago73% | 8 days ago58% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago60% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago63% | 4 days ago47% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
MUOSX | 32.88 | 0.34 | +1.04% |
Morgan Stanley Instl US Core R6 | |||
NDGCX | 23.93 | 0.14 | +0.59% |
Neuberger Berman Dividend Growth C | |||
GQEPX | 21.66 | 0.11 | +0.51% |
GQG Partners US Select Quality Eq Inv | |||
CIMEX | 26.65 | 0.08 | +0.30% |
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529E | |||
CPLSX | 17.80 | -0.04 | -0.22% |
Calamos Phineus Long/Short A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that DAR and SAPIF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DAR and SAPIF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DAR | 100% | -0.20% | ||
SAPIF - DAR | 32% Poorly correlated | +9.30% | ||
LWAY - DAR | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
FAMI - DAR | 27% Poorly correlated | +5.43% | ||
K - DAR | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.01% | ||
BRCC - DAR | 27% Poorly correlated | -7.10% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SAPIF and DAR have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAPIF and DAR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAPIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SAPIF | 100% | +9.30% | ||
DAR - SAPIF | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
FLO - SAPIF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
NOMD - SAPIF | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.34% | ||
CENTA - SAPIF | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.26% | ||
ASBFY - SAPIF | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
More |