DBCCF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
42.97M
ELTP
Price
$0.54
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
42.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DBCCF vs ELTP

Header iconDBCCF vs ELTP Comparison
Open Charts DBCCF vs ELTPBanner chart's image
Decibel Cannabis
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$32.1K
Capitalization42.97M
Elite Pharmaceuticals
Price$0.54
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$454.1K
Capitalization42.58M
DBCCF vs ELTP Comparison Chart
Loading...
ELTP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DBCCF vs. ELTP commentary
Jun 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBCCF is a Hold and ELTP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 03, 2025
Stock price -- (DBCCF: $0.05 vs. ELTP: $0.54)
Brand notoriety: DBCCF and ELTP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DBCCF: 31% vs. ELTP: 53%
Market capitalization -- DBCCF: $42.97M vs. ELTP: $42.58M
DBCCF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $42.97M. ELTP’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $42.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DBCCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileELTP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DBCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ELTP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ELTP is a better buy in the long-term than DBCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELTP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ELTP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

DBCCF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +2.88% price change this week, while ELTP (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +2.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +13.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +74.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

DBCCF is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2025.

ELTP is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+13.40% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DBCCF($43M) and ELTP($42.6M) have the same market capitalization . DBCCF has higher P/E ratio than ELTP: DBCCF (37.45) vs ELTP (11.95). DBCCF YTD gains are higher at: 3.950 vs. ELTP (-0.203). ELTP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.72M vs. DBCCF (6.05M). ELTP has more cash in the bank: 17.9M vs. DBCCF (3.87M). ELTP has less debt than DBCCF: ELTP (16M) vs DBCCF (49.3M). DBCCF has higher revenues than ELTP: DBCCF (89.8M) vs ELTP (33.2M).
DBCCFELTPDBCCF / ELTP
Capitalization43M42.6M101%
EBITDA6.05M7.72M78%
Gain YTD3.950-0.203-1,943%
P/E Ratio37.4511.95313%
Revenue89.8M33.2M270%
Total Cash3.87M17.9M22%
Total Debt49.3M16M308%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DBCCF vs ELTP: Fundamental Ratings
DBCCF
ELTP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10034
SMR RATING
1..100
9094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5736
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
553
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DBCCF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as ELTP (72). This means that DBCCF’s stock grew similarly to ELTP’s over the last 12 months.

ELTP's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DBCCF (100). This means that ELTP’s stock grew significantly faster than DBCCF’s over the last 12 months.

DBCCF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as ELTP (94). This means that DBCCF’s stock grew similarly to ELTP’s over the last 12 months.

ELTP's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as DBCCF (57). This means that ELTP’s stock grew similarly to DBCCF’s over the last 12 months.

ELTP's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DBCCF (55). This means that ELTP’s stock grew somewhat faster than DBCCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELTP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ELTP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CP81.650.44
+0.54%
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
CNDT2.240.01
+0.45%
Conduent
SELF5.760.01
+0.17%
Global Self Storage
SCS10.31-0.05
-0.48%
Steelcase
PB69.65-0.47
-0.67%
Prosperity Bancshares

DBCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DBCCF and AYTU have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DBCCF and AYTU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBCCF
1D Price
Change %
DBCCF100%
+3.31%
AYTU - DBCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
ESALF - DBCCF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CXXIF - DBCCF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
CRLBF - DBCCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-11.29%
ELTP - DBCCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
More

ELTP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ELTP and QNTM have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELTP and QNTM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELTP
1D Price
Change %
ELTP100%
+0.18%
QNTM - ELTP
24%
Poorly correlated
+7.00%
ECGS - ELTP
15%
Poorly correlated
+36.36%
HKMPF - ELTP
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRUSF - ELTP
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBCCF - ELTP
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.31%
More