Ad is loading...
DBEF vs EFA
DBEF vs EFA Comparison
Open Charts DBEF vs EFA
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
Price$43.32
Change-$0.03 (-0.07%)
Volume$1.9K
Net Assets7.78B
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Price$82.05
Change+$0.20 (+0.24%)
Volume$75.67K
Net Assets57.42B
DBEF vs EFA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DBEF vs. EFA commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBEF is a Hold and EFA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFA has more net assets: 57.4B vs. DBEF (7.78B). EFA has a higher annual dividend yield than DBEF: EFA (8.504) vs DBEF (4.710). DBEF was incepted earlier than EFA: DBEF (14 years) vs EFA (24 years). EFA (0.32) has a lower expense ratio than DBEF (0.35). DBEF has a higher turnover EFA (3.00) vs EFA (3.00).
| DBEF | EFA | DBEF / EFA | |
| Gain YTD | 4.710 | 8.504 | 55% |
| Net Assets | 7.78B | 57.4B | 14% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.32 | 109% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 3.00 | 367% |
| Yield | 1.24 | 3.00 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DBEF | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | 17 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DBEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBEF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DBEF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DBEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBEF | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| STM - DBEF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| BN - DBEF | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| ASML - DBEF | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| PRU - DBEF | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| ASX - DBEF | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.63% | ||
More | ||||