Ad is loading...
DBELX vs OEMNX
DBELX vs OEMNX Comparison
Open Charts DBELX vs OEMNX
DoubleLine Em Mkts Lcl Ccy Bd I
Price$8.90
Change+$0.02 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.64M
Invesco Emerging Markets Local Debt R
Price$5.29
Change+$0.03 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.41M
DBELX vs OEMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DBELX vs. OEMNX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBELX is a Hold and OEMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OEMNX has more cash in the bank: 81.4M vs. DBELX (12.6M). OEMNX pays higher dividends than DBELX: OEMNX (6.53) vs DBELX (2.67). DBELX was incepted earlier than OEMNX: DBELX (6 years) vs OEMNX (15 years). DBELX (2.35) is less costly to investors than OEMNX (1.76). OEMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. DBELX (31.00). OEMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than DBELX: OEMNX (1000) vs DBELX (100000). DBELX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.72 vs. OEMNX (5.99). DBELX return over 5 years is better than : 11.95 vs. OEMNX (9.24).
| DBELX | OEMNX | DBELX / OEMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.48 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.76 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.338 | 6.942 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6M | 81.4M | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 6.53 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.72 | 5.99 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.81 | 15.29 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.95 | 9.24 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.98 | - |