DBSDF
Price
$37.91
Change
-$1.24 (-3.17%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
111.15B
FKKFY
Price
$15.00
Change
-$0.16 (-1.06%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
5.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DBSDF vs FKKFY

Header iconDBSDF vs FKKFY Comparison
Open Charts DBSDF vs FKKFYBanner chart's image
DBS Group Holdings
Price$37.91
Change-$1.24 (-3.17%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization111.15B
Fukuoka Financial Group
Price$15.00
Change-$0.16 (-1.06%)
Volume$203
Capitalization5.76B
DBSDF vs FKKFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DBSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FKKFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DBSDF vs. FKKFY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBSDF is a Hold and FKKFY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (DBSDF: $37.91 vs. FKKFY: $15.00)
Brand notoriety: DBSDF and FKKFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DBSDF: 33% vs. FKKFY: 29%
Market capitalization -- DBSDF: $111.15B vs. FKKFY: $5.76B
DBSDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $111.15B. FKKFY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $164.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DBSDF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFKKFY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • DBSDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FKKFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FKKFY is a better buy in the long-term than DBSDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DBSDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FKKFY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DBSDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FKKFY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FKKFY is a better buy in the short-term than DBSDF.

Price Growth

DBSDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.17% price change this week, while FKKFY (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.65% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DBSDF($111B) has a higher market cap than FKKFY($5.76B). DBSDF has higher P/E ratio than FKKFY: DBSDF (12.36) vs FKKFY (11.61). FKKFY YTD gains are higher at: 20.968 vs. DBSDF (13.707). DBSDF has less debt than FKKFY: DBSDF (76.3B) vs FKKFY (7.99T). FKKFY has higher revenues than DBSDF: FKKFY (286B) vs DBSDF (22.8B).
DBSDFFKKFYDBSDF / FKKFY
Capitalization111B5.76B1,927%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.70720.96865%
P/E Ratio12.3611.61106%
Revenue22.8B286B8%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt76.3B7.99T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DBSDF vs FKKFY: Fundamental Ratings
DBSDF
FKKFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1884
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
923
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2436
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FKKFY's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DBSDF (88). This means that FKKFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DBSDF’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as FKKFY (23). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew similarly to FKKFY’s over the last 12 months.

FKKFY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as DBSDF (4). This means that FKKFY’s stock grew similarly to DBSDF’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as FKKFY (50). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew similarly to FKKFY’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as FKKFY (36). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew similarly to FKKFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DBSDFFKKFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DBSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FKKFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JWGRX130.63N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Research S
DIEYX45.70N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon International Core Equity Y
RSYEX62.18N/A
N/A
Victory RS Small Cap Growth Y
BIFRX20.79N/A
N/A
BlackRock International R
RGEBX83.30-0.80
-0.95%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E

DBSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBSDF has been loosely correlated with DNBBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DBSDF jumps, then DNBBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBSDF
1D Price
Change %
DBSDF100%
-3.17%
DNBBF - DBSDF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
DBSDY - DBSDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
CHBAF - DBSDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FKKFY - DBSDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UOVEY - DBSDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
More

FKKFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKKFY and DBSDF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKKFY and DBSDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKKFY
1D Price
Change %
FKKFY100%
N/A
DBSDF - FKKFY
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.17%
MFG - FKKFY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
BKHPF - FKKFY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTFY - FKKFY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGNN - FKKFY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
More