DBSDF
Price
$38.36
Change
-$3.13 (-7.54%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
111.94B
FKKFY
Price
$13.34
Change
-$2.22 (-14.27%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
5.69B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DBSDF vs FKKFY

Header iconDBSDF vs FKKFY Comparison
Open Charts DBSDF vs FKKFYBanner chart's image
DBS Group Holdings
Price$38.36
Change-$3.13 (-7.54%)
Volume$1.07K
Capitalization111.94B
Fukuoka Financial Group
Price$13.34
Change-$2.22 (-14.27%)
Volume$1.76K
Capitalization5.69B
DBSDF vs FKKFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DBSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FKKFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DBSDF vs. FKKFY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBSDF is a Hold and FKKFY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (DBSDF: $38.36 vs. FKKFY: $13.34)
Brand notoriety: DBSDF and FKKFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DBSDF: 4% vs. FKKFY: 248%
Market capitalization -- DBSDF: $111.94B vs. FKKFY: $5.69B
DBSDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $111.94B. FKKFY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DBSDF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFKKFY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • DBSDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FKKFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, DBSDF is a better buy in the long-term than FKKFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DBSDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FKKFY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DBSDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FKKFY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FKKFY is a better buy in the short-term than DBSDF.

Price Growth

DBSDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.59% price change this week, while FKKFY (@Regional Banks) price change was -14.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DBSDF($112B) has a higher market cap than FKKFY($5.69B). DBSDF has higher P/E ratio than FKKFY: DBSDF (12.55) vs FKKFY (10.35). DBSDF YTD gains are higher at: 15.057 vs. FKKFY (7.581). DBSDF has less debt than FKKFY: DBSDF (76.3B) vs FKKFY (7.99T). FKKFY has higher revenues than DBSDF: FKKFY (286B) vs DBSDF (22.8B).
DBSDFFKKFYDBSDF / FKKFY
Capitalization112B5.69B1,967%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.0577.581199%
P/E Ratio12.5510.35121%
Revenue22.8B286B8%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt76.3B7.99T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DBSDF vs FKKFY: Fundamental Ratings
DBSDF
FKKFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
828
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
929
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4455
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2563
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FKKFY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DBSDF (88). This means that FKKFY’s stock grew significantly faster than DBSDF’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as FKKFY (29). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew similarly to FKKFY’s over the last 12 months.

FKKFY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as DBSDF (4). This means that FKKFY’s stock grew similarly to DBSDF’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as FKKFY (55). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew similarly to FKKFY’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FKKFY (63). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FKKFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DBSDFFKKFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
42%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DBSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FKKFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RLBGX37.84N/A
N/A
American Funds American Balanced R6
BRWCX26.43N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq C
ZDIIX27.73N/A
N/A
Zacks Dividend Institutional
TRWRX24.97N/A
N/A
Transamerica International Equity R
JACFX19.65N/A
N/A
JHancock Mid Cap Growth NAV

DBSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBSDF has been loosely correlated with DNBBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DBSDF jumps, then DNBBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBSDF
1D Price
Change %
DBSDF100%
-7.54%
DNBBF - DBSDF
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
DBSDY - DBSDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
CHBAF - DBSDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FKKFY - DBSDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UOVEY - DBSDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
More

FKKFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKKFY and DBSDF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKKFY and DBSDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKKFY
1D Price
Change %
FKKFY100%
N/A
DBSDF - FKKFY
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.54%
MFG - FKKFY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
BKHPF - FKKFY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTFY - FKKFY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGNN - FKKFY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
More