Ad is loading...
DBSDF
Price
$33.09
Change
+$0.40 (+1.22%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
UOVEF
Price
$27.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
Ad is loading...

DBSDF vs UOVEF

Header iconDBSDF vs UOVEF Comparison
Open Charts DBSDF vs UOVEFBanner chart's image
DBS Group Holdings
Price$33.09
Change+$0.40 (+1.22%)
Volume$2.02K
CapitalizationN/A
United Overseas Bank
Price$27.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$114
CapitalizationN/A
DBSDF vs UOVEF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DBSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DBSDF vs. UOVEF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBSDF is a Buy and UOVEF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (DBSDF: $33.09 vs. UOVEF: $27.20)
Brand notoriety: DBSDF and UOVEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DBSDF: 76% vs. UOVEF: 15%
Market capitalization -- DBSDF: $66.63B vs. UOVEF: $37.94B
DBSDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $66.63B. UOVEF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $37.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DBSDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUOVEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DBSDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UOVEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DBSDF and UOVEF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DBSDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DBSDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

DBSDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.93% price change this week, while UOVEF (@Regional Banks) price change was +15.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DBSDF($66.6B) has a higher market cap than UOVEF($37.9B). UOVEF (7.90) and DBSDF (7.68) have similar P/E ratio . DBSDF YTD gains are higher at: 43.247 vs. UOVEF (25.635). UOVEF has less debt than DBSDF: UOVEF (33.9B) vs DBSDF (47.1B). DBSDF has higher revenues than UOVEF: DBSDF (17.7B) vs UOVEF (13.6B).
DBSDFUOVEFDBSDF / UOVEF
Capitalization66.6B37.9B176%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD43.24725.635169%
P/E Ratio7.687.9097%
Revenue17.7B13.6B130%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt47.1B33.9B139%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DBSDF vs UOVEF: Fundamental Ratings
DBSDF
UOVEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1330
SMR RATING
1..100
35
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3940
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UOVEF's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as DBSDF (97). This means that UOVEF’s stock grew similarly to DBSDF’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as UOVEF (30). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew similarly to UOVEF’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as UOVEF (5). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew similarly to UOVEF’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as UOVEF (41). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew similarly to UOVEF’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as UOVEF (40). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew similarly to UOVEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DBSDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DBSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HFQSX6.080.01
+0.16%
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income S
NMFAX15.19-0.20
-1.30%
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Core A
TAGDX15.35-0.22
-1.41%
Transamerica Large Growth R6
GSAHX15.78-0.30
-1.87%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Investor
LHCSX19.47-0.68
-3.37%
Lord Abbett Health Care R4

DBSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBSDF has been loosely correlated with DNBBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DBSDF jumps, then DNBBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBSDF
1D Price
Change %
DBSDF100%
+1.22%
DNBBF - DBSDF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
DBSDY - DBSDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
CHBAF - DBSDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FKKFY - DBSDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.77%
UOVEY - DBSDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
More

UOVEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UOVEF and PPERF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UOVEF and PPERF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UOVEF
1D Price
Change %
UOVEF100%
N/A
PPERF - UOVEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASCN - UOVEF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBSDF - UOVEF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
USMT - UOVEF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNIF - UOVEF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.90%
More