DBSDF
Price
$28.39
Change
-$1.00 (-3.40%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
66.63B
UOVEF
Price
$26.99
Change
-$2.03 (-7.00%)
Updated
Mar 31 closing price
Capitalization
37.94B
Ad is loading...

DBSDF vs UOVEF

Header iconDBSDF vs UOVEF Comparison
Open Charts DBSDF vs UOVEFBanner chart's image
DBS Group Holdings
Price$28.39
Change-$1.00 (-3.40%)
Volume$3.36K
Capitalization66.63B
United Overseas Bank
Price$26.99
Change-$2.03 (-7.00%)
Volume$400
Capitalization37.94B
DBSDF vs UOVEF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DBSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DBSDF vs. UOVEF commentary
Apr 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBSDF is a Hold and UOVEF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2025
Stock price -- (DBSDF: $28.39 vs. UOVEF: $26.99)
Brand notoriety: DBSDF and UOVEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DBSDF: 83% vs. UOVEF: 5%
Market capitalization -- DBSDF: $66.63B vs. UOVEF: $37.94B
DBSDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $66.63B. UOVEF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $37.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DBSDF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUOVEF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • DBSDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UOVEF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, UOVEF is a better buy in the long-term than DBSDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DBSDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DBSDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

DBSDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -15.91% price change this week, while UOVEF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.32%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.92% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DBSDF($66.6B) has a higher market cap than UOVEF($37.9B). UOVEF (7.90) and DBSDF (7.68) have similar P/E ratio . UOVEF YTD gains are higher at: -4.298 vs. DBSDF (-14.847). UOVEF has less debt than DBSDF: UOVEF (33.9B) vs DBSDF (47.1B). DBSDF has higher revenues than UOVEF: DBSDF (17.7B) vs UOVEF (13.6B).
DBSDFUOVEFDBSDF / UOVEF
Capitalization66.6B37.9B176%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-14.847-4.298345%
P/E Ratio7.687.9097%
Revenue17.7B13.6B130%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt47.1B33.9B139%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DBSDF vs UOVEF: Fundamental Ratings
DBSDF
UOVEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7993
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1219
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3025
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UOVEF's Valuation (83) in the null industry is in the same range as DBSDF (93). This means that UOVEF’s stock grew similarly to DBSDF’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as UOVEF (19). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew similarly to UOVEF’s over the last 12 months.

DBSDF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as UOVEF (3). This means that DBSDF’s stock grew similarly to UOVEF’s over the last 12 months.

UOVEF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as DBSDF (60). This means that UOVEF’s stock grew similarly to DBSDF’s over the last 12 months.

UOVEF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as DBSDF (30). This means that UOVEF’s stock grew similarly to DBSDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DBSDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DBSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAISX9.130.04
+0.44%
Calamos International Small Cap Gr A
PWJDX29.15N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison International Opps R4
IALAX33.14N/A
N/A
Transamerica Capital Growth A
BUFBX19.83N/A
N/A
Buffalo Flexible Allocation
PRIGX16.67N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Glbl Val Eq Cl I

DBSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBSDF has been loosely correlated with DNBBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DBSDF jumps, then DNBBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBSDF
1D Price
Change %
DBSDF100%
-3.40%
DNBBF - DBSDF
43%
Loosely correlated
+11.67%
DBSDY - DBSDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.30%
CHBAF - DBSDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FKKFY - DBSDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+8.36%
UOVEY - DBSDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.15%
More

UOVEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UOVEF and PPERF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UOVEF and PPERF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UOVEF
1D Price
Change %
UOVEF100%
N/A
PPERF - UOVEF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.75%
ASCN - UOVEF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBSDF - UOVEF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.40%
USMT - UOVEF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNIF - UOVEF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
More