DC
Price
$2.08
Change
-$0.15 (-6.73%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
69 days until earnings call
GLGDF
Price
$0.75
Change
-$0.04 (-5.06%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
48 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DC vs GLGDF

Header iconDC vs GLGDF Comparison
Open Charts DC vs GLGDFBanner chart's image
Dakota Gold
Price$2.08
Change-$0.15 (-6.73%)
Volume$456.47K
CapitalizationN/A
GoGold Resources
Price$0.75
Change-$0.04 (-5.06%)
Volume$142.86K
CapitalizationN/A
DC vs GLGDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DC vs. GLGDF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DC is a Hold and GLGDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (DC: $2.08 vs. GLGDF: $0.75)
Brand notoriety: DC and GLGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DC: 158% vs. GLGDF: 89%
Market capitalization -- DC: $205.57M vs. GLGDF: $298.17M
DC [@Precious Metals] is valued at $205.57M. GLGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $298.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLGDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GLGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DC and GLGDF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLGDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • GLGDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLGDF is a better buy in the short-term than DC.

Price Growth

DC (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.96% price change this week, while GLGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -13.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

DC is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

GLGDF is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLGDF($298M) has a higher market cap than DC($206M). GLGDF has higher P/E ratio than DC: GLGDF (769.23) vs DC (41.32). DC YTD gains are higher at: -20.611 vs. GLGDF (-22.789). GLGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.76M vs. DC (-37.73M). GLGDF has more cash in the bank: 88.8M vs. DC (25.5M). DC has less debt than GLGDF: DC (230K) vs GLGDF (778K). GLGDF has higher revenues than DC: GLGDF (28.6M) vs DC (0).
DCGLGDFDC / GLGDF
Capitalization206M298M69%
EBITDA-37.73M-3.76M1,004%
Gain YTD-20.611-22.78990%
P/E Ratio41.32769.235%
Revenue028.6M-
Total Cash25.5M88.8M29%
Total Debt230K778K30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLGDF: Fundamental Ratings
GLGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
64
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DCGLGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DK17.510.99
+5.99%
Delek US Holdings
SMECF413.723.72
+0.91%
SMC Corp
LIND11.940.10
+0.84%
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings
BZ13.910.10
+0.72%
Kanzhun Limited
CMCM4.77-1.35
-22.06%
Cheetah Mobile

GLGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLGDF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLGDF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLGDF
1D Price
Change %
GLGDF100%
+1.09%
PAAS - GLGDF
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
MAG - GLGDF
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
HL - GLGDF
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
AYASF - GLGDF
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
SILV - GLGDF
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
More