Ad is loading...
DCCAX vs FSSNX
DCCAX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCCAX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core A
Price$27.60
Change+$0.49 (+1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.96B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$25.48
Change+$0.41 (+1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.17B
DCCAX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCAX vs. FSSNX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCAX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. DCCAX (6.96B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCCAX: FSSNX (1.13) vs DCCAX (0.45). DCCAX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCCAX (26 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCCAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than DCCAX: FSSNX (0) vs DCCAX (1000). DCCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. FSSNX (-1.09). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 99.84 vs. DCCAX (71.91).
| DCCAX | FSSNX | DCCAX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.03 | 4,360% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.03 | 4,360% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.209 | -9.429 | 87% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.96B | 24.2B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 1.13 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.53 | -1.09 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.33 | 1.04 | -510% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.91 | 99.84 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.73 | 56.42 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers