Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCCAX vs FSSNX
DCCAX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCCAX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core A
Price$30.12
Change-$0.28 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.63B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$30.86
Change-$0.35 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.42B
DCCAX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCAX vs. FSSNX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCAX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 28.4B vs. DCCAX (6.63B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCCAX: FSSNX (0.82) vs DCCAX (0.40). DCCAX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCCAX (27 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCCAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than DCCAX: FSSNX (0) vs DCCAX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.11 vs. DCCAX (5.20). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 59.58 vs. DCCAX (37.85).
| DCCAX | FSSNX | DCCAX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.03 | 4,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.03 | 4,240% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.121 | 12.753 | 24% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.63B | 28.4B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.82 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.20 | 15.11 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.26 | 53.21 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.85 | 59.58 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.72 | 110.36 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement