Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCCAX vs NAESX
DCCAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts DCCAX vs NAESX
Macquarie Small Cap Core A
Price$27.97
Change+$0.37 (+1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.01B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$111.61
Change+$1.26 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
DCCAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCAX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCAX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. DCCAX (7.01B). NAESX pays higher dividends than DCCAX: NAESX (1.35) vs DCCAX (0.45). DCCAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: DCCAX (26 years) vs NAESX (65 years). DCCAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). DCCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). DCCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: DCCAX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.13 vs. DCCAX (3.39). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 52.20 vs. DCCAX (30.71).
| DCCAX | NAESX | DCCAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.17 | 624% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.17 | 624% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.122 | -4.086 | 125% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.01B | 148B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 1.35 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.39 | 5.13 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.95 | 16.63 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.71 | 52.20 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.47 | 96.08 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement