Ad is loading...
DCCAX vs NAESX
DCCAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts DCCAX vs NAESX
Macquarie Small Cap Core A
Price$26.09
Change+$0.44 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.58B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$100.96
Change+$1.49 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
DCCAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCAX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCAX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. DCCAX (6.58B). NAESX pays higher dividends than DCCAX: NAESX (1.39) vs DCCAX (0.45). DCCAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: DCCAX (26 years) vs NAESX (65 years). DCCAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). DCCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). DCCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: DCCAX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX (-3.88) and DCCAX (-3.98) have marching annual gain over last year. NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 69.04 vs. DCCAX (42.34).
| DCCAX | NAESX | DCCAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.17 | 641% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.17 | 641% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.417 | -13.542 | 106% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.58B | 143B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 1.39 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.98 | -3.88 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.15 | 3.78 | -189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.34 | 69.04 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.16 | 74.33 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...