Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCCCX vs FSSNX
DCCCX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCCCX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core C
Price$23.17
Change+$0.30 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.01B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$26.63
Change+$0.44 (+1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.88B
DCCCX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCCX vs. FSSNX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCCX is a Buy and FSSNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. DCCCX (7.01B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCCCX: FSSNX (1.10) vs DCCCX (0.00). DCCCX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCCCX (20 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCCCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than DCCCX: FSSNX (0) vs DCCCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.90 vs. DCCCX (2.48). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. DCCCX (23.11).
| DCCCX | FSSNX | DCCCX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.03 | 7,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.03 | 7,240% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.429 | -5.383 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.01B | 24.9B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.48 | 3.90 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.56 | 14.69 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.11 | 45.42 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.27 | 65.51 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement