Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCCCX vs FSSNX
DCCCX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCCCX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core C
Price$23.76
Change-$0.10 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.21B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$27.92
Change-$0.11 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
DCCCX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCCX vs. FSSNX commentary
Jul 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCCX is a Buy and FSSNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. DCCCX (7.21B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCCCX: FSSNX (0.92) vs DCCCX (0.00). DCCCX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCCCX (20 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCCCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than DCCCX: FSSNX (0) vs DCCCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.14 vs. DCCCX (-1.29). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 57.12 vs. DCCCX (29.41).
| DCCCX | FSSNX | DCCCX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.03 | 7,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.03 | 7,240% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.020 | 1.264 | -239% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.21B | 25.6B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.92 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.29 | 4.14 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.49 | 30.09 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.41 | 57.12 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.33 | 80.26 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers