Ad is loading...
DCCCX vs FSSNX
DCCCX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCCCX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core C
Price$20.59
Change+$0.28 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.32B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$23.18
Change+$0.36 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.17B
DCCCX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCCX vs. FSSNX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCCX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. DCCCX (6.32B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCCCX: FSSNX (1.13) vs DCCCX (0.00). DCCCX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCCCX (20 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCCCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than DCCCX: FSSNX (0) vs DCCCX (1000). DCCCX (-8.72) and FSSNX (-9.01) have marching annual gain over last year. FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 53.55 vs. DCCCX (28.46).
| DCCCX | FSSNX | DCCCX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.03 | 7,360% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.03 | 7,360% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.102 | -17.558 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 24.2B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.72 | -9.01 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.61 | -3.22 | 423% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.46 | 53.55 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.23 | 41.25 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers