It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DCGO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEHAB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DCGO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EHAB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
DCGO is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.
EHAB is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
DCGO | EHAB | DCGO / EHAB | |
Capitalization | 156M | 386M | 40% |
EBITDA | 14.7M | -62.8M | -23% |
Gain YTD | -62.972 | -2.433 | 2,588% |
P/E Ratio | 13.00 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 521M | 1.03B | 50% |
Total Cash | 79M | 39.5M | 200% |
Total Debt | 60.9M | 544M | 11% |
DCGO | EHAB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 3 days ago57% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago60% | 3 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago63% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago68% | 4 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago82% | 17 days ago86% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EHAB has been loosely correlated with PNTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EHAB jumps, then PNTG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EHAB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EHAB | 100% | -2.31% | ||
PNTG - EHAB | 45% Loosely correlated | +7.79% | ||
AVAH - EHAB | 44% Loosely correlated | +5.68% | ||
USPH - EHAB | 40% Loosely correlated | +4.69% | ||
LFST - EHAB | 32% Poorly correlated | +13.21% | ||
DCGO - EHAB | 32% Poorly correlated | +12.95% | ||
More |