Advertisement
DCMDF vs HHEGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCMDF is a Hold and HHEGF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DCMDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHHEGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- DCMDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HHEGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DCMDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HHEGF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DCMDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- HHEGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
DCMDF (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -0.93% price change this week, while HHEGF (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.30%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.39%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.31% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
@Other Consumer Specialties (+0.60% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
| DCMDF | HHEGF | DCMDF / HHEGF | |
| Capitalization | 60.3M | 30.3M | 199% |
| EBITDA | 57.4M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -23.027 | -94.995 | 24% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.38 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 474M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 7.28M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 274M | N/A | - |
DCMDF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DCMDF | HHEGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 5 days ago 13% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 33% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 37% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 54% |
Advertisement
DCMDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DCMDF and YUMM have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DCMDF and YUMM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DCMDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCMDF | 100% | -1.83% | ||
| YUMM - DCMDF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CASS - DCMDF | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| UDMY - DCMDF | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
| ESTTF - DCMDF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KSCP - DCMDF | 9% Poorly correlated | -3.47% | ||
More | ||||
HHEGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HHEGF has been loosely correlated with BSEFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HHEGF jumps, then BSEFY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HHEGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HHEGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BSEFY - HHEGF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TRI - HHEGF | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.09% | ||
| SSHT - HHEGF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GNS - HHEGF | 4% Poorly correlated | +8.51% | ||
| DCMDF - HHEGF | 2% Poorly correlated | -1.83% | ||
More | ||||