DCNNF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.34M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
GRLVF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 15 closing price
Capitalization
64.24M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DCNNF vs GRLVF

Header iconDCNNF vs GRLVF Comparison
Open Charts DCNNF vs GRLVFBanner chart's image
QUEST CRITICAL METALS
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$76.39K
Capitalization1.34M
Group Eleven Resources
Price$0.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$243.17K
Capitalization64.24M
DCNNF vs GRLVF Comparison Chart in %
DCNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRLVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DCNNF vs. GRLVF commentary
Oct 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCNNF is a Hold and GRLVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 17, 2025
Stock price -- (DCNNF: $0.03 vs. GRLVF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: DCNNF and GRLVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DCNNF: 94% vs. GRLVF: 95%
Market capitalization -- DCNNF: $1.34M vs. GRLVF: $64.24M
DCNNF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.34M. GRLVF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $64.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DCNNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRLVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DCNNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRLVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRLVF is a better buy in the long-term than DCNNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DCNNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRLVF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DCNNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GRLVF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DCNNF and GRLVF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DCNNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +12.76% price change this week, while GRLVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -9.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +9.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +34.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +330.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+9.16% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRLVF($64.2M) has a higher market cap than DCNNF($1.34M). GRLVF YTD gains are higher at: 99.679 vs. DCNNF (-53.632). DCNNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -469.51K vs. GRLVF (-4.76M). GRLVF has more cash in the bank: 4.17M vs. DCNNF (88.9K). DCNNF (0) and GRLVF (0) have equivalent revenues.
DCNNFGRLVFDCNNF / GRLVF
Capitalization1.34M64.2M2%
EBITDA-469.51K-4.76M10%
Gain YTD-53.63299.679-54%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash88.9K4.17M2%
Total Debt400KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DCNNF vs GRLVF: Fundamental Ratings
DCNNF
GRLVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1062
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10026
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9641
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRLVF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as DCNNF (62). This means that GRLVF’s stock grew similarly to DCNNF’s over the last 12 months.

GRLVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DCNNF (100). This means that GRLVF’s stock grew significantly faster than DCNNF’s over the last 12 months.

GRLVF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as DCNNF (100). This means that GRLVF’s stock grew similarly to DCNNF’s over the last 12 months.

GRLVF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DCNNF (96). This means that GRLVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DCNNF’s over the last 12 months.

GRLVF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DCNNF (100). This means that GRLVF’s stock grew similarly to DCNNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DCNNFGRLVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DCNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRLVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RPTX1.900.03
+1.60%
Repare Therapeutics
PAC225.511.98
+0.89%
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico SAB de CV Amer Dep Shares (each rep 10 Ser B shares)
NRIM21.05-0.39
-1.82%
Northrim BanCorp
DGLY1.97-0.06
-2.96%
Digital Ally Inc New
EFSC56.18-1.78
-3.07%
Enterprise Financial Services Corp

DCNNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DCNNF and LTRBF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DCNNF and LTRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DCNNF
1D Price
Change %
DCNNF100%
N/A
LTRBF - DCNNF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRLVF - DCNNF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
BHSIF - DCNNF
25%
Poorly correlated
+6.27%
FPRGF - DCNNF
25%
Poorly correlated
+44.44%
YORKF - DCNNF
24%
Poorly correlated
+37.24%
More

GRLVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRLVF and DCNNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRLVF and DCNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRLVF
1D Price
Change %
GRLVF100%
-2.21%
DCNNF - GRLVF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRGXF - GRLVF
11%
Poorly correlated
+6.82%
HANNF - GRLVF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
GSCCF - GRLVF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
GPPRF - GRLVF
4%
Poorly correlated
+7.10%
More