DCNSF
Price
$7.32
Change
-$0.18 (-2.40%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
20.38B
PUK
Price
$24.89
Change
+$0.15 (+0.61%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.79B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DCNSF vs PUK

Header iconDCNSF vs PUK Comparison
Open Charts DCNSF vs PUKBanner chart's image
Dai-ichi Life Holdings
Price$7.32
Change-$0.18 (-2.40%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization20.38B
Prudential
Price$24.89
Change+$0.15 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization25.79B
DCNSF vs PUK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DCNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DCNSF vs. PUK commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCNSF is a Hold and PUK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (DCNSF: $7.32 vs. PUK: $24.75)
Brand notoriety: DCNSF and PUK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DCNSF: 397% vs. PUK: 115%
Market capitalization -- DCNSF: $20.38B vs. PUK: $25.79B
DCNSF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $20.38B. PUK’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $25.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DCNSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePUK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DCNSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PUK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DCNSF is a better buy in the long-term than PUK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DCNSF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DCNSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PUK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DCNSF is a better buy in the short-term than PUK.

Price Growth

DCNSF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PUK (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -1.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

PUK is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.79% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PUK($25.8B) has a higher market cap than DCNSF($20.4B). PUK has higher P/E ratio than DCNSF: PUK (15.34) vs DCNSF (14.14). PUK YTD gains are higher at: 57.612 vs. DCNSF (8.446). PUK has less debt than DCNSF: PUK (4.87B) vs DCNSF (964B). DCNSF has higher revenues than PUK: DCNSF (9.09T) vs PUK (12B).
DCNSFPUKDCNSF / PUK
Capitalization20.4B25.8B79%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.44657.61215%
P/E Ratio14.1415.3492%
Revenue9.09T12B75,758%
Total Cash1.79TN/A-
Total Debt964B4.87B19,778%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DCNSF vs PUK: Fundamental Ratings
DCNSF
PUK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9266
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21100
SMR RATING
1..100
10094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8157
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DCNSF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PUK (79) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that DCNSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PUK’s over the last 12 months.

DCNSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PUK (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that DCNSF’s stock grew significantly faster than PUK’s over the last 12 months.

PUK's SMR Rating (94) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as DCNSF (100) in the null industry. This means that PUK’s stock grew similarly to DCNSF’s over the last 12 months.

PUK's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as DCNSF (52) in the null industry. This means that PUK’s stock grew similarly to DCNSF’s over the last 12 months.

PUK's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as DCNSF (81) in the null industry. This means that PUK’s stock grew similarly to DCNSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DCNSFPUK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DCNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GVUS50.410.51
+1.02%
Goldman Sachs MktBt Russell LgCpValEqETF
GSEU42.430.14
+0.33%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Europe Eq ETF
TPLE27.010.03
+0.11%
Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cp Cr Enh ETF
RDVI24.970.02
+0.08%
FT Vest Ris Div Ach Trg Inc ETF
NJNK20.20N/A
N/A
Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF

DCNSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DCNSF and BHF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DCNSF and BHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DCNSF
1D Price
Change %
DCNSF100%
N/A
BHF - DCNSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PUK - DCNSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
LNC - DCNSF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
AAIGF - DCNSF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+5.98%
FG - DCNSF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
More

PUK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PUK has been loosely correlated with MFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PUK jumps, then MFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUK
1D Price
Change %
PUK100%
-0.20%
MFC - PUK
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
AAGIY - PUK
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
PNGAY - PUK
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
PRU - PUK
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
LNC - PUK
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
More