Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCZRX vs FSSNX
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCZRX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core R6
Price$31.66
Change+$0.07 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.8B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$29.82
Change+$0.37 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.66B
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCZRX vs. FSSNX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCZRX is a StrongBuy and FSSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.7B vs. DCZRX (6.8B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCZRX: FSSNX (0.84) vs DCZRX (0.68). DCZRX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCZRX (9 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCZRX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCZRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). DCZRX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.86 vs. DCZRX (8.34). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 62.74 vs. DCZRX (46.73).
| DCZRX | FSSNX | DCZRX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.03 | 2,720% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.03 | 2,720% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.076 | 8.273 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.8B | 27.7B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.84 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.34 | 13.86 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.02 | 39.98 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.73 | 62.74 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement