Ad is loading...
DCZRX vs FSSNX
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCZRX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core R6
Price$25.40
Change-$1.14 (-4.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.4B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$22.76
Change-$1.04 (-4.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.17B
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCZRX vs. FSSNX commentary
Apr 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCZRX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. DCZRX (6.4B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCZRX: FSSNX (1.13) vs DCZRX (0.77). DCZRX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCZRX (9 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCZRX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCZRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). DCZRX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DCZRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.48 vs. FSSNX (-9.71). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 81.43 vs. DCZRX (63.85).
| DCZRX | FSSNX | DCZRX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.03 | 2,880% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.03 | 2,880% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.502 | -17.775 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.4B | 24.2B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.13 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.48 | -9.71 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.49 | -6.23 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.85 | 81.43 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.25 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers