Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCZRX vs FSSNX
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCZRX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core R6
Price$31.26
Change+$0.46 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.46B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.39
Change+$0.60 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.42B
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCZRX vs. FSSNX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCZRX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 28.4B vs. DCZRX (6.46B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCZRX: FSSNX (0.82) vs DCZRX (0.69). DCZRX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCZRX (9 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCZRX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCZRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). DCZRX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.40 vs. DCZRX (-0.20). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 59.82 vs. DCZRX (39.38).
| DCZRX | FSSNX | DCZRX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.03 | 2,720% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.03 | 2,720% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.249 | 11.236 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.46B | 28.4B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.82 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.20 | 9.40 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.47 | 47.66 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.38 | 59.82 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement