Ad is loading...
DCZRX vs FSSNX
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCZRX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core R6
Price$31.56
Change+$0.09 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.74B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.26
Change+$0.12 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.09B
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCZRX vs. FSSNX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCZRX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.1B vs. DCZRX (7.74B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCZRX: FSSNX (1.36) vs DCZRX (0.69). DCZRX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCZRX (9 years) vs FSSNX (13 years). DCZRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). DCZRX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX (20.08) and DCZRX (19.67) have marching annual gain over last year. FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. DCZRX (32.23).
| DCZRX | FSSNX | DCZRX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.748 | 2.095 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.74B | 27.1B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.36 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 20.08 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.00 | 13.99 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.23 | 40.02 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.83 | - |