Ad is loading...
DCZRX vs FSSNX
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCZRX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core R6
Price$27.80
Change+$0.52 (+1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.74B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$25.27
Change+$0.46 (+1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.69B
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCZRX vs. FSSNX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCZRX is a Buy and FSSNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. DCZRX (6.74B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCZRX: FSSNX (1.16) vs DCZRX (0.80). DCZRX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCZRX (9 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCZRX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCZRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). DCZRX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DCZRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.53 vs. FSSNX (-1.73). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 56.34 vs. DCZRX (44.29).
| DCZRX | FSSNX | DCZRX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.03 | 2,720% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.03 | 2,720% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.613 | -10.368 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.74B | 23.7B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.16 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.53 | -1.73 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.68 | 18.54 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.29 | 56.34 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers