Ad is loading...
DCZRX vs FSSNX
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCZRX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core R6
Price$30.09
Change-$0.77 (-2.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.31B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$27.28
Change-$0.83 (-2.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.16B
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCZRX vs. FSSNX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCZRX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.2B vs. DCZRX (7.31B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCZRX: FSSNX (1.36) vs DCZRX (0.69). DCZRX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCZRX (9 years) vs FSSNX (13 years). DCZRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). DCZRX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DCZRX (10.72) and FSSNX (10.61) have marching annual gain over last year. FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. DCZRX (27.87).
| DCZRX | FSSNX | DCZRX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.085 | -1.445 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.31B | 27.2B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.36 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.72 | 10.61 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.87 | 16.37 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.87 | 36.70 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...