Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCZRX vs FSSNX
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCZRX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core R6
Price$28.64
Change-$0.48 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.02B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$26.25
Change-$0.48 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.88B
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCZRX vs. FSSNX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCZRX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. DCZRX (7.02B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCZRX: FSSNX (1.10) vs DCZRX (0.76). DCZRX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCZRX (9 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCZRX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCZRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). DCZRX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.63 vs. DCZRX (4.06). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 58.19 vs. DCZRX (43.38).
| DCZRX | FSSNX | DCZRX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.03 | 2,720% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.03 | 2,720% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.851 | -5.166 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.02B | 24.9B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.10 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.06 | 4.63 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.49 | 29.17 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.38 | 58.19 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.25 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement