Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCZRX vs FSSNX
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCZRX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core R6
Price$29.99
Change+$0.20 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.01B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.29
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
DCZRX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCZRX vs. FSSNX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCZRX is a Buy and FSSNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. DCZRX (7.01B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCZRX: FSSNX (0.92) vs DCZRX (0.73). DCZRX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCZRX (9 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCZRX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCZRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). DCZRX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.28 vs. DCZRX (0.14). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 60.96 vs. DCZRX (42.83).
| DCZRX | FSSNX | DCZRX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.03 | 2,720% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.03 | 2,720% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.414 | 2.204 | -64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.01B | 25.6B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.92 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | 3.28 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.32 | 31.42 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.83 | 60.96 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers