Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCZRX vs FTHFX
DCZRX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts DCZRX vs FTHFX
Macquarie Small Cap Core R6
Price$31.12
Change-$0.13 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.63B
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.02
Change-$0.09 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.26B
DCZRX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCZRX vs. FTHFX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCZRX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. DCZRX (6.63B). FTHFX (0.70) and DCZRX (0.68) have matching dividends . DCZRX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: DCZRX (9 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). DCZRX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. DCZRX (26.00). DCZRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: DCZRX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). DCZRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.29 vs. FTHFX (2.30). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 109.79 vs. DCZRX (50.45).
| DCZRX | FTHFX | DCZRX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.63 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.63 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.728 | 10.326 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.63B | 11.3B | 59% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.70 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.29 | 2.30 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.91 | 62.85 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.45 | 109.79 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 181.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers