Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCZRX vs FTHFX
DCZRX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts DCZRX vs FTHFX
Macquarie Small Cap Core R6
Price$30.11
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.21B
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
DCZRX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCZRX vs. FTHFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCZRX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. DCZRX (6.21B). FTHFX (0.70) and DCZRX (0.69) have matching dividends . DCZRX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: DCZRX (10 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). DCZRX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. DCZRX (26.00). DCZRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: DCZRX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). DCZRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.64 vs. FTHFX (-5.11). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. DCZRX (20.88).
| DCZRX | FTHFX | DCZRX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.63 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.63 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.019 | 6.957 | -15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.21B | 10.8B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.70 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.64 | -5.11 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.35 | 36.76 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.88 | 79.21 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 159.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement