Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCZRX vs NAESX
DCZRX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts DCZRX vs NAESX
Macquarie Small Cap Core R6
Price$31.26
Change+$0.46 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.46B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.98
Change+$1.67 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
DCZRX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCZRX vs. NAESX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCZRX is a Hold and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. DCZRX (6.46B). NAESX pays higher dividends than DCZRX: NAESX (1.23) vs DCZRX (0.69). DCZRX was incepted earlier than NAESX: DCZRX (9 years) vs NAESX (65 years). DCZRX (0.68) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). DCZRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). DCZRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: DCZRX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. DCZRX (-0.20). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 57.74 vs. DCZRX (39.38).
| DCZRX | NAESX | DCZRX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.17 | 400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.17 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.249 | 5.577 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.46B | 162B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.23 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.20 | 4.75 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.47 | 43.69 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.38 | 57.74 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 129.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement