Ad is loading...
DCZRX vs NAESX
DCZRX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts DCZRX vs NAESX
Macquarie Small Cap Core R6
Price$25.40
Change-$1.14 (-4.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.4B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$96.20
Change-$4.90 (-4.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.45B
DCZRX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCZRX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCZRX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. DCZRX (6.4B). NAESX pays higher dividends than DCZRX: NAESX (1.39) vs DCZRX (0.77). DCZRX was incepted earlier than NAESX: DCZRX (9 years) vs NAESX (65 years). DCZRX (0.72) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). DCZRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). DCZRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: DCZRX (0) vs NAESX (3000). DCZRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.48 vs. NAESX (-9.21). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 91.51 vs. DCZRX (63.85).
| DCZRX | NAESX | DCZRX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.17 | 424% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.17 | 424% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.502 | -16.384 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.4B | 153B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.39 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.48 | -9.21 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.49 | -3.54 | 324% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.85 | 91.51 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers