Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCZRX vs NAESX
DCZRX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts DCZRX vs NAESX
Macquarie Small Cap Core R6
Price$30.11
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.21B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.69
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
DCZRX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCZRX vs. NAESX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCZRX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. DCZRX (6.21B). NAESX pays higher dividends than DCZRX: NAESX (1.22) vs DCZRX (0.69). DCZRX was incepted earlier than NAESX: DCZRX (10 years) vs NAESX (65 years). DCZRX (0.68) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). DCZRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). DCZRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: DCZRX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.86 vs. DCZRX (-4.64). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 39.31 vs. DCZRX (20.88).
| DCZRX | NAESX | DCZRX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.17 | 400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.17 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.019 | 2.409 | -42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.21B | 162B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.22 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.64 | -0.86 | 543% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.35 | 29.99 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.88 | 39.31 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 122.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement