DDCCF
Price
$2.35
Change
+$0.10 (+4.44%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
189.65M
SVAUF
Price
$3.38
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.24B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DDCCF vs SVAUF

Header iconDDCCF vs SVAUF Comparison
Open Charts DDCCF vs SVAUFBanner chart's image
BRANICKS GROUP AG
Price$2.35
Change+$0.10 (+4.44%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization189.65M
Storagevault Canada
Price$3.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$45.14K
Capitalization1.24B
DDCCF vs SVAUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DDCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DDCCF vs. SVAUF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDCCF is a Buy and SVAUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (DDCCF: $2.35 vs. SVAUF: $3.38)
Brand notoriety: DDCCF and SVAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DDCCF: 36% vs. SVAUF: 731%
Market capitalization -- DDCCF: $189.65M vs. SVAUF: $1.24B
DDCCF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $189.65M. SVAUF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DDCCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSVAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DDCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SVAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DDCCF is a better buy in the long-term than SVAUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DDCCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVAUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DDCCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SVAUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DDCCF is a better buy in the short-term than SVAUF.

Price Growth

DDCCF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +3.30% price change this week, while SVAUF (@Real Estate Development) price change was -2.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +4.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+4.17% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVAUF($1.24B) has a higher market cap than DDCCF($190M). SVAUF YTD gains are higher at: 23.358 vs. DDCCF (7.306). SVAUF (168M) and DDCCF (161M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . DDCCF has more cash in the bank: 105M vs. SVAUF (21.5M). DDCCF (2.15B) and SVAUF (2.18B) have identical debt. SVAUF has higher revenues than DDCCF: SVAUF (319M) vs DDCCF (244M).
DDCCFSVAUFDDCCF / SVAUF
Capitalization190M1.24B15%
EBITDA161M168M96%
Gain YTD7.30623.35831%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue244M319M76%
Total Cash105M21.5M488%
Total Debt2.15B2.18B99%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SVAUF: Fundamental Ratings
SVAUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
35
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DDCCFSVAUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DDCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSUTX130.82N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Utilities
SECAX11.84N/A
N/A
SEI Small Cap II A (SIIT)
UBVRX83.74N/A
N/A
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Val R2
SOCUX21.57N/A
N/A
Spirit of America Utilities C
FSHOX130.70N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Construction & Housing

DDCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DDCCF and SVAUF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DDCCF and SVAUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DDCCF
1D Price
Change %
DDCCF100%
N/A
SVAUF - DDCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLPPY - DDCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
CLLNY - DDCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
OPEN - DDCCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+6.22%
NYC - DDCCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+5.97%
More

SVAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVAUF and AANNF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVAUF and AANNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVAUF
1D Price
Change %
SVAUF100%
N/A
AANNF - SVAUF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VONOY - SVAUF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
DTCWY - SVAUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JLL - SVAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
OPEN - SVAUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.22%
More