Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DDLS vs FDTS
DDLS vs FDTS Comparison
Open Charts DDLS vs FDTS
WisdomTree Dynamic Intl SmCap Eq ETF
Price$41.92
Change-$0.11 (-0.26%)
Volume$295
Net Assets430.62M
First Trust DevMkts exUS SC AlphaDEX®ETF
Price$56.36
Change-$0.54 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.49M
DDLS vs FDTS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DDLS vs. FDTS commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDLS is a Hold and FDTS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DDLS has more net assets: 431M vs. FDTS (8.49M). FDTS has a higher annual dividend yield than DDLS: FDTS (45.710) vs DDLS (24.162). DDLS was incepted earlier than FDTS: DDLS (10 years) vs FDTS (14 years). DDLS (0.48) has a lower expense ratio than FDTS (0.80). FDTS has a higher turnover DDLS (37.00) vs DDLS (37.00).
| DDLS | FDTS | DDLS / FDTS | |
| Gain YTD | 24.162 | 45.710 | 53% |
| Net Assets | 431M | 8.49M | 5,076% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.80 | 60% |
| Turnover | 37.00 | 117.00 | 32% |
| Yield | 4.02 | 3.20 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DDLS | FDTS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DDLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDLS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DDLS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DDLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDLS | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| MT - DDLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| DOV - DDLS | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| HMC - DDLS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| CE - DDLS | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.79% | ||
| AMG - DDLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
More | ||||
FDTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDTS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDTS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDTS | 100% | N/A | ||
| MT - FDTS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| CE - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | -3.79% | ||
| APAM - FDTS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| CTS - FDTS | 51% Loosely correlated | -4.49% | ||
| KAR - FDTS | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
More | ||||