Ad is loading...
DDLS vs FNDC
DDLS vs FNDC Comparison
Open Charts DDLS vs FNDC
WisdomTree Dyn Ccy Hdgd Intl SmCp Eq ETF
Price$34.75
Change+$0.25 (+0.72%)
Volume$40.84K
Net Assets352.1M
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$34.11
Change+$0.17 (+0.50%)
Volume$176.04K
Net Assets3.02B
DDLS vs FNDC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DDLS vs. FNDC commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDLS is a Hold and FNDC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 3.02B vs. DDLS (352M). FNDC has a higher annual dividend yield than DDLS: FNDC (-0.088) vs DDLS (-0.658). DDLS was incepted earlier than FNDC: DDLS (9 years) vs FNDC (11 years). DDLS has a higher turnover FNDC (30.00) vs FNDC (30.00).
| DDLS | FNDC | DDLS / FNDC | |
| Gain YTD | -0.658 | -0.088 | 748% |
| Net Assets | 352M | 3.02B | 12% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 48.00 | 30.00 | 160% |
| Yield | 3.67 | 2.82 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DDLS | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 73% | 11 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 75% | 11 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 71% | 11 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 68% | 11 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 89% | 13 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 72% | 11 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DDLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDLS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DDLS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DDLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDLS | 100% | +0.72% | ||
| MT - DDLS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| DOV - DDLS | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| HMC - DDLS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| CE - DDLS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| DAN - DDLS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
More | ||||
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | +0.50% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 68% Closely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| CE - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| INTU - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| CG - FNDC | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.79% | ||
More | ||||