Ad is loading...
DDLS vs FNDC
DDLS vs FNDC Comparison
Open Charts DDLS vs FNDC
WisdomTree Dyn Ccy Hdgd Intl SmCp Eq ETF
Price$34.90
Change-$0.64 (-1.80%)
Volume$985
Net Assets383.71M
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$35.95
Change-$0.34 (-0.94%)
Volume$1.65K
Net Assets3.16B
DDLS vs FNDC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DDLS vs. FNDC commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDLS is a Hold and FNDC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 3.16B vs. DDLS (384M). FNDC has a higher annual dividend yield than DDLS: FNDC (6.298) vs DDLS (1.951). DDLS was incepted earlier than FNDC: DDLS (9 years) vs FNDC (12 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than DDLS (0.48). DDLS has a higher turnover FNDC (22.00) vs FNDC (22.00).
| DDLS | FNDC | DDLS / FNDC | |
| Gain YTD | 1.951 | 6.298 | 31% |
| Net Assets | 384M | 3.16B | 12% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.39 | 123% |
| Turnover | 37.00 | 22.00 | 168% |
| Yield | 3.76 | 3.40 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DDLS | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 10 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DDLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDLS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DDLS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DDLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDLS | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| MT - DDLS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| DOV - DDLS | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| HMC - DDLS | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| CE - DDLS | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| DAN - DDLS | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.48% | ||
More | ||||
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | N/A | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 68% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| CE - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| INTU - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| CG - FNDC | 60% Loosely correlated | +4.61% | ||
More | ||||