It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DDOG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSEAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DDOG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEAC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
DDOG (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.80% price change this week, while SEAC (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.47%.
DDOG is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
DDOG | SEAC | DDOG / SEAC | |
Capitalization | 44.4B | 15M | 296,000% |
EBITDA | 250M | 626K | 39,936% |
Gain YTD | -10.945 | -23.077 | 47% |
P/E Ratio | 353.47 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 2.84B | 32.8M | 8,643% |
Total Cash | 4.45B | 18.7M | 23,797% |
Total Debt | 1.88B | 1.22M | 154,486% |
DDOG | SEAC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 94 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 47 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SEAC's Valuation (47) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DDOG (92) in the null industry. This means that SEAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than DDOG’s over the last 12 months.
DDOG's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as SEAC (100) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that DDOG’s stock grew similarly to SEAC’s over the last 12 months.
DDOG's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as SEAC (95) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that DDOG’s stock grew similarly to SEAC’s over the last 12 months.
DDOG's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as SEAC (63) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that DDOG’s stock grew similarly to SEAC’s over the last 12 months.
DDOG's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEAC (62) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that DDOG’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEAC’s over the last 12 months.
DDOG | SEAC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago60% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago68% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago78% | 26 days ago70% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago60% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
IDHQ | 33.04 | 0.38 | +1.16% |
Invesco S&P International Dev Qual ETF | |||
JHI | 14.08 | 0.01 | +0.08% |
John Hancock Investors Trust Capital Stock | |||
HYTI | 19.90 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF | |||
EAOR | 33.98 | -0.04 | -0.11% |
iShares ESG Aware 60/40 Bal Allc ETF | |||
SLYV | 84.78 | -0.60 | -0.70% |
SPDR® S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEAC has been loosely correlated with PUBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SEAC jumps, then PUBM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SEAC | 100% | N/A | ||
PUBM - SEAC | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
TDC - SEAC | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
SOPA - SEAC | 35% Loosely correlated | -18.15% | ||
DDOG - SEAC | 34% Loosely correlated | +2.19% | ||
LTCH - SEAC | 33% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |