It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DDOG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSEAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DDOG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEAC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
DDOG (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.32% price change this week, while SEAC (@Packaged Software) price change was +50.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.78%.
DDOG is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
SEAC is expected to report earnings on Jun 07, 2023.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
DDOG | SEAC | DDOG / SEAC | |
Capitalization | 41B | 12.6M | 325,397% |
EBITDA | 111M | 626K | 17,732% |
Gain YTD | 4.864 | 7.692 | 63% |
P/E Ratio | 879.64 | 0.58 | 150,551% |
Revenue | 2.13B | 32.8M | 6,488% |
Total Cash | 2.58B | 15.2M | 16,993% |
Total Debt | 902M | 1.22M | 74,239% |
DDOG | SEAC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 68 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SEAC's Valuation (40) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DDOG (90) in the null industry. This means that SEAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than DDOG’s over the last 12 months.
DDOG's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEAC (100) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that DDOG’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEAC’s over the last 12 months.
DDOG's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as SEAC (95) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that DDOG’s stock grew similarly to SEAC’s over the last 12 months.
SEAC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as DDOG (41) in the null industry. This means that SEAC’s stock grew similarly to DDOG’s over the last 12 months.
SEAC's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as DDOG (68) in the null industry. This means that SEAC’s stock grew similarly to DDOG’s over the last 12 months.
DDOG | SEAC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago68% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 5 days ago70% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago79% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
QLTI | 25.79 | 0.04 | +0.14% |
GMO International Quality ETF | |||
MBS | 8.60 | N/A | +0.01% |
Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | |||
PSFM | 30.53 | N/A | N/A |
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF | |||
EMLP | 37.80 | -0.10 | -0.26% |
First Trust North Amer Engy InfrasETF | |||
SDS | 15.80 | -0.10 | -0.63% |
ProShares UltraShort S&P500 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDOG has been loosely correlated with DT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DDOG jumps, then DT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DDOG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DDOG | 100% | +4.06% | ||
DT - DDOG | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
COIN - DDOG | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
NOW - DDOG | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.75% | ||
HUBS - DDOG | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
CLSK - DDOG | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.21% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEAC has been loosely correlated with PUBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SEAC jumps, then PUBM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SEAC | 100% | N/A | ||
PUBM - SEAC | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.17% | ||
TDC - SEAC | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.08% | ||
SOPA - SEAC | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
DDOG - SEAC | 34% Loosely correlated | +4.06% | ||
LTCH - SEAC | 33% Poorly correlated | +7.69% | ||
More |