It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DDS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDDT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DDS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DDT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
DDS (@Department Stores) experienced а +6.85% price change this week, while DDT (@Department Stores) price change was +1.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.18%.
DDS is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.
A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.
DDS | DDT | DDS / DDT | |
Capitalization | 5.71B | N/A | - |
EBITDA | 949M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -18.450 | 1.517 | -1,216% |
P/E Ratio | 9.56 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 6.59B | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 1.04B | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 555M | N/A | - |
DDS | DDT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DDT's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as DDS (34) in the Department Stores industry. This means that DDT’s stock grew similarly to DDS’s over the last 12 months.
DDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Department Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for DDT (100) in the null industry. This means that DDS’s stock grew significantly faster than DDT’s over the last 12 months.
DDS's SMR Rating (29) in the Department Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for DDT (100) in the null industry. This means that DDS’s stock grew significantly faster than DDT’s over the last 12 months.
DDT's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as DDS (76) in the Department Stores industry. This means that DDT’s stock grew similarly to DDS’s over the last 12 months.
DDS's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Department Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DDT (100) in the null industry. This means that DDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than DDT’s over the last 12 months.
DDS | DDT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago7% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago18% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago17% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago14% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago15% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 3 days ago16% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago68% | 11 days ago12% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago19% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 4 days ago12% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
DPST | 70.16 | 2.45 | +3.62% |
Direxion Daily Regional Bnks Bull 3X ETF | |||
MMLG | 28.69 | 0.33 | +1.15% |
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Gr ETF | |||
FLC | 16.33 | 0.11 | +0.68% |
Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund | |||
QQQS | 23.21 | 0.06 | +0.26% |
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF | |||
MLPX | 59.91 | -0.24 | -0.40% |
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that DDT and JWN have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DDT and JWN's prices will move in lockstep.