DDS vs FDP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDS is a StrongBuy and FDP is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DDS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFDP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DDS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- FDP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DDS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FDP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DDS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FDP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
DDS (@Department Stores) experienced а +2.67% price change this week, while FDP (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was +7.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.95%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.67%.
Reported Earning Dates
DDS is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.
FDP is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Department Stores (+1.43% weekly)A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.
@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+1.17% weekly)The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| DDS | FDP | DDS / FDP | |
| Capitalization | 5.17B | 1.23B | 419% |
| EBITDA | 949M | 125M | 759% |
| Gain YTD | -25.264 | 4.222 | -598% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.94 | 10.18 | 88% |
| Revenue | 6.59B | 4.32B | 153% |
| Total Cash | 1.04B | 33.8M | 3,089% |
| Total Debt | 555M | 598M | 93% |
DDS | FDP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 33 Fair valued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 49 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FDP's Valuation (30) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as DDS (33) in the Department Stores industry. This means that FDP’s stock grew similarly to DDS’s over the last 12 months.
DDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Department Stores industry is in the same range as FDP (49) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that DDS’s stock grew similarly to FDP’s over the last 12 months.
DDS's SMR Rating (29) in the Department Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDP (78) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that DDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDP’s over the last 12 months.
FDP's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DDS (79) in the Department Stores industry. This means that FDP’s stock grew somewhat faster than DDS’s over the last 12 months.
DDS's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Department Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDP (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that DDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDP’s over the last 12 months.
| DDS | FDP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 68% | 17 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 46% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GGRW | 27.92 | 0.60 | +2.21% |
| Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF | |||
| PRFZ | 35.94 | 0.52 | +1.47% |
| Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | |||
| EASG | 31.10 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Eq ETF | |||
| VCV | 9.76 | -0.01 | -0.10% |
| INVESCO CALIFORNIA VALUE MUNI Income TRUST | |||
| JXI | 70.11 | -0.58 | -0.82% |
| iShares Global Utilities ETF | |||
DDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDS has been loosely correlated with M. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DDS jumps, then M could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDS | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| M - DDS | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| KSS - DDS | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| JWN - DDS | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| TOKUY - DDS | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MAKSF - DDS | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
FDP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDP has been loosely correlated with DOLE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDP jumps, then DOLE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDP | 100% | +1.48% | ||
| DOLE - FDP | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| TSN - FDP | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
| ADM - FDP | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
| ALCO - FDP | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
| LMNR - FDP | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.50% | ||
More | ||||