DDT
Price
$25.13
Change
-$0.54 (-2.10%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
M
Price
$11.38
Change
-$0.03 (-0.26%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
3.17B
46 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DDT vs M

Header iconDDT vs M Comparison
Open Charts DDT vs MBanner chart's image
Dillard's Capital Trust I
Price$25.13
Change-$0.54 (-2.10%)
Volume$95.74K
CapitalizationN/A
Macy's
Price$11.38
Change-$0.03 (-0.26%)
Volume$14.09M
Capitalization3.17B
DDT vs M Comparison Chart
Loading...
DDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DDT vs. M commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDT is a Hold and M is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (DDT: $25.67 vs. M: $11.41)
Brand notoriety: DDT: Not notable vs. M: Notable
Both companies represent the Department Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DDT: 273% vs. M: 225%
Market capitalization -- DDT: $0 vs. M: $3.17B
DDT [@Department Stores] is valued at $0. M’s [@Department Stores] market capitalization is $3.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Department Stores] industry ranges from $12.34T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Department Stores] industry is $4.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DDT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DDT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • M’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DDT is a better buy in the long-term than M.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DDT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while M’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DDT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • M’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DDT is a better buy in the short-term than M.

Price Growth

DDT (@Department Stores) experienced а -1.23% price change this week, while M (@Department Stores) price change was -13.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was -0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

M is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Department Stores (-0.94% weekly)

A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DDT YTD gains are higher at: -0.156 vs. M (-31.691).
DDTMDDT / M
CapitalizationN/A3.17B-
EBITDAN/A1.24B-
Gain YTD-0.156-31.6910%
P/E RatioN/A5.50-
RevenueN/A23.4B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A5.83B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DDT vs M: Fundamental Ratings
DDT
M
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5856
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10084
SMR RATING
1..100
10085
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5479
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

M's Valuation (6) in the Department Stores industry is in the same range as DDT (23) in the null industry. This means that M’s stock grew similarly to DDT’s over the last 12 months.

M's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the Department Stores industry is in the same range as DDT (100) in the null industry. This means that M’s stock grew similarly to DDT’s over the last 12 months.

M's SMR Rating (85) in the Department Stores industry is in the same range as DDT (100) in the null industry. This means that M’s stock grew similarly to DDT’s over the last 12 months.

DDT's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as M (79) in the Department Stores industry. This means that DDT’s stock grew similarly to M’s over the last 12 months.

DDT's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as M (100) in the Department Stores industry. This means that DDT’s stock grew similarly to M’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DDTM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
5%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OXLCP24.22-0.03
-0.11%
Oxford Lane Capital Corp
BOC14.49-0.20
-1.36%
Boston Omaha Corp
EGP165.80-9.85
-5.61%
EastGroup Properties
ALUR3.12-0.23
-6.87%
Allurion Technologies
HBI4.92-1.03
-17.31%
Hanesbrands

DDT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DDT and JWN have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DDT and JWN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DDT
1D Price
Change %
DDT100%
-0.77%
JWN - DDT
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
KSS - DDT
19%
Poorly correlated
-22.79%
M - DDT
15%
Poorly correlated
-13.50%
DDS - DDT
13%
Poorly correlated
-11.92%
CBDBY - DDT
8%
Poorly correlated
-7.89%

M and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, M has been loosely correlated with KSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if M jumps, then KSS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To M
1D Price
Change %
M100%
-13.50%
KSS - M
48%
Loosely correlated
-22.79%
DDS - M
47%
Loosely correlated
-11.92%
JWN - M
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
MAKSY - M
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.69%
SRGHY - M
9%
Poorly correlated
-5.06%
More