Ad is loading...
DDWM vs FNDF
DDWM vs FNDF Comparison
Open Charts DDWM vs FNDF
WisdomTree Dynamic Ccy Hdgd Intl Eq ETF
Price$37.49
Change+$0.32 (+0.86%)
Volume$200
Net Assets441.2M
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$36.91
Change+$0.44 (+1.21%)
Volume$2.78K
Net Assets14.57B
DDWM vs FNDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DDWM vs. FNDF commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDWM is a Buy and FNDF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 14.6B vs. DDWM (441M). FNDF has a higher annual dividend yield than DDWM: FNDF (9.816) vs DDWM (8.448). DDWM was incepted earlier than FNDF: DDWM (9 years) vs FNDF (12 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than DDWM (0.40). DDWM has a higher turnover FNDF (11.00) vs FNDF (11.00).
| DDWM | FNDF | DDWM / FNDF | |
| Gain YTD | 8.448 | 9.816 | 86% |
| Net Assets | 441M | 14.6B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.25 | 160% |
| Turnover | 28.00 | 11.00 | 255% |
| Yield | 3.15 | 3.70 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DDWM | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 71% | 17 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DDWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDWM has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DDWM jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DDWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDWM | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| STM - DDWM | 69% Closely correlated | +4.41% | ||
| BHP - DDWM | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| WDS - DDWM | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| SHEL - DDWM | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| SAN - DDWM | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.31% | ||
More | ||||
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | +4.41% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +2.26% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
More | ||||