Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEEAX vs RPLCX
DEEAX vs RPLCX Comparison
Open Charts DEEAX vs RPLCX
Macquarie Extended Duration Bond A
Price$14.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.42M
T. Rowe Price Instl Lng Dur Crdt
Price$7.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.19M
DEEAX vs RPLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEEAX vs. RPLCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEEAX is a Hold and RPLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DEEAX has more cash in the bank: 299M vs. RPLCX (205M). RPLCX pays higher dividends than DEEAX: RPLCX (5.51) vs DEEAX (4.76). DEEAX was incepted earlier than RPLCX: DEEAX (27 years) vs RPLCX (12 years). DEEAX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RPLCX (0.45). DEEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. RPLCX (68.30). DEEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPLCX: DEEAX (1000) vs RPLCX (1000000). RPLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.36 vs. DEEAX (-0.21). RPLCX return over 5 years is better than : -16.31 vs. DEEAX (-21.94).
| DEEAX | RPLCX | DEEAX / RPLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.45 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.45 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.769 | 6.491 | 89% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 205M | 146% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.76 | 5.51 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.21 | 0.36 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.12 | 21.34 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.94 | -16.31 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.03 | 17.41 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement