Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEEAX vs RPLCX
DEEAX vs RPLCX Comparison
Open Charts DEEAX vs RPLCX
Macquarie Extended Duration Bond A
Price$13.83
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.48M
T. Rowe Price Instl Lng Dur Crdt
Price$7.39
Change-$0.02 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.19M
DEEAX vs RPLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEEAX vs. RPLCX commentary
Jul 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEEAX is a Hold and RPLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DEEAX has more cash in the bank: 295M vs. RPLCX (196M). RPLCX pays higher dividends than DEEAX: RPLCX (5.54) vs DEEAX (4.71). DEEAX was incepted earlier than RPLCX: DEEAX (27 years) vs RPLCX (12 years). DEEAX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RPLCX (0.45). DEEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. RPLCX (59.30). DEEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPLCX: DEEAX (1000) vs RPLCX (1000000). RPLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.30 vs. DEEAX (1.75). RPLCX return over 5 years is better than : -21.47 vs. DEEAX (-27.47).
| DEEAX | RPLCX | DEEAX / RPLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.45 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.45 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.600 | 2.061 | 78% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 295M | 196M | 151% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.71 | 5.54 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.75 | 2.30 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.60 | 1.25 | -48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.47 | -21.47 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.72 | 12.51 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers