Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEECX vs RPLCX
DEECX vs RPLCX Comparison
Open Charts DEECX vs RPLCX
Macquarie Extended Duration Bond C
Price$13.88
Change+$0.06 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.24M
T. Rowe Price Instl Lng Dur Crdt
Price$7.42
Change+$0.03 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets195.63M
DEECX vs RPLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEECX vs. RPLCX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEECX is a Hold and RPLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DEECX has more cash in the bank: 295M vs. RPLCX (196M). RPLCX pays higher dividends than DEECX: RPLCX (5.54) vs DEECX (3.95). DEECX was incepted earlier than RPLCX: DEECX (27 years) vs RPLCX (12 years). DEECX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RPLCX (0.45). DEECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. RPLCX (59.30). DEECX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPLCX: DEECX (1000) vs RPLCX (1000000). RPLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.84 vs. DEECX (1.63). RPLCX return over 5 years is better than : -21.47 vs. DEECX (-30.17).
| DEECX | RPLCX | DEECX / RPLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.45 | 347% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.45 | 384% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.296 | 2.061 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 295M | 196M | 151% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.95 | 5.54 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.63 | 2.84 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.39 | 2.45 | -57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.17 | -21.47 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.89 | 12.85 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers