Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEECX vs RPLCX
DEECX vs RPLCX Comparison
Open Charts DEECX vs RPLCX
Macquarie Extended Duration Bond C
Price$13.62
Change-$0.11 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.38M
T. Rowe Price Instl Lng Dur Crdt
Price$7.29
Change-$0.05 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.3M
DEECX vs RPLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEECX vs. RPLCX commentary
Jun 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEECX is a Hold and RPLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DEECX has more cash in the bank: 299M vs. RPLCX (203M). RPLCX pays higher dividends than DEECX: RPLCX (5.69) vs DEECX (4.03). DEECX was incepted earlier than RPLCX: DEECX (27 years) vs RPLCX (12 years). DEECX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RPLCX (0.45). DEECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. RPLCX (59.30). DEECX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPLCX: DEECX (1000) vs RPLCX (1000000). RPLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.25 vs. DEECX (-1.07). RPLCX return over 5 years is better than : -16.80 vs. DEECX (-25.24).
| DEECX | RPLCX | DEECX / RPLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.45 | 347% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.45 | 384% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.516 | 0.249 | -207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 203M | 147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.03 | 5.69 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.07 | 0.25 | -433% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.82 | 0.30 | -1,277% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.24 | -16.80 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.96 | 11.90 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers