Ad is loading...
DEECX vs RPLCX
DEECX vs RPLCX Comparison
Open Charts DEECX vs RPLCX
Macquarie Extended Duration Bond C
Price$13.87
Change+$0.04 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets326.39M
T. Rowe Price Instl Lng Dur Crdt
Price$7.44
Change+$0.04 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.19M
DEECX vs RPLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEECX vs. RPLCX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEECX is a Hold and RPLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DEECX has more cash in the bank: 326M vs. RPLCX (206M). RPLCX pays higher dividends than DEECX: RPLCX (5.55) vs DEECX (3.91). DEECX was incepted earlier than RPLCX: DEECX (27 years) vs RPLCX (12 years). DEECX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RPLCX (0.45). DEECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. RPLCX (59.30). DEECX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPLCX: DEECX (1000) vs RPLCX (1000000). RPLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.78 vs. DEECX (4.38). RPLCX return over 5 years is better than : -15.28 vs. DEECX (-23.68).
| DEECX | RPLCX | DEECX / RPLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.45 | 347% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.45 | 384% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.634 | 0.813 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 326M | 206M | 158% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.91 | 5.55 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.38 | 5.78 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.39 | -0.07 | 4,970% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.68 | -15.28 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.26 | 7.29 | -72% |